Skip to content

Conversation

@egonSchiele
Copy link
Owner

When varargs are given with a maybe[block], and the block is not provided, do not append an extra nil to the varargs (see waterlink's issue #161).

What do you think of this @waterlink ?

…ided, do not append an extra nil to the varargs (fixes issue #161)
@waterlink
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM
On Jul 24, 2015 1:54 AM, "Aditya Bhargava" [email protected] wrote:

When varargs are given with a maybe[block], and the block is not provided,
do not append an extra nil to the varargs (see waterlink's issue #161
#161).

What do you think of this @waterlink https://github.com/waterlink ?

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#188
Commit Summary

File Changes

Patch Links:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#188.

waterlink added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2015
bug fix for varargs with a maybe[block]
@waterlink waterlink merged commit 50556ef into master Jul 24, 2015
@waterlink waterlink deleted the adit/161 branch July 24, 2015 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants