Skip to content

docs: enhance project readme - #61

Merged
edhor1608 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/enhance-readme
May 21, 2026
Merged

edhor1608 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/enhance-readme

Conversation

@edhor1608

@edhor1608 edhor1608 commented May 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Note

Expand README with usage examples, output rules, and project structure

Rewrites README.md to give a fuller picture of how Passepartout works and how to use it.

  • Adds a 'What It Does' section covering canvas behavior, export ratios/sizes, border defaults, EXIF orientation, metadata stripping, and overwrite avoidance
  • Expands the 'Usage' section with separate examples for single-file, directory, and custom border inputs
  • Clarifies --out and --border-px semantics in 'Options'
  • Replaces 'Rules' with 'Output Rules', split into I/O behavior and layout/rendering behavior
  • Adds a 'Project Structure' section listing key source files and tests

Macroscope summarized 8dedf53.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced documentation with clearer explanation of v1 behavior and default settings
    • Improved usage examples with separate instructions for single and batch image processing
    • Added custom border configuration examples
    • Documented output rules and project structure overview

Review Change Stack

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates README.md to improve documentation clarity and organization. The opening description and "What It Does" section are expanded to enumerate specific v1 product behaviors including white-canvas output, border defaults, EXIF handling, and metadata stripping. The "Usage" section is restructured to separate single-image and directory processing examples, adds a border customization example, and splits options and output rules into distinct subsections. A new "Project Structure" section lists key source files by functional role, and the "Docs" list is updated to reference additional planning documentation.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: enhance project readme' directly and accurately describes the main change—a comprehensive rewrite and reorganization of the README documentation with new sections and improved clarity.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/enhance-readme
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch codex/enhance-readme

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

edhor1608 commented May 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@edhor1608
edhor1608 force-pushed the codex/enhance-readme branch from 9cfa709 to 8dedf53 Compare May 21, 2026 13:24

edhor1608 commented May 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merge activity

  • May 21, 1:26 PM UTC: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • May 21, 1:26 PM UTC: @edhor1608 merged this pull request with Graphite.

@edhor1608
edhor1608 merged commit fee0f12 into main May 21, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant