policy-catalogue: add Zig / Zig Software Foundation entry - #25
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Closes #9. Verbatim excerpts verified against the pinned source before submission.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds
policy-catalogue/zig.md, closing #9. Note on sourcing: there is no CONTRIBUTING.md inziglang/zigand the old wiki page is now a redirect — the operative text lives in the Code of Conduct under "Strict No LLM / No AI Policy", surfaced in-repo only as a one-line link in.forgejo/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml("Please do not use GitHub Copilot or any other LLM to write an issue").This is the strictest policy in the catalogue and the only one that reaches upstream of the artifact — it bars using an LLM to brainstorm even when you write the prose yourself, and bars acting on chatbot advice when commenting. Two more things worth your attention: it bans LLM translation, which four other catalogued policies explicitly permit or encourage, resolving the accessibility question the opposite way ("post in your native language and rely on others to have their own translation tools") — so a
translationsstance value can't be read as a proxy for inclusiveness. And "No talking about use of chatbot/LLM services" is a speech rule, not a contribution rule, which nothing else in the corpus has.Also relevant to the
canonical_urlquestion raised in the Home Assistant entry, from the opposite direction: here the repository holds only a pointer and the policy lives on the website, so an agent reading the repo would find the link but not the text.AI disclosure (required — we dogfood our own standard)
Attestations (required)
Type of contribution
policy-catalogue/)I've left
policy-catalogue/README.mduntouched across this batch — #21 already edits that table and several PRs touching the same rows would conflict. Happy to send one follow-up PR updating the count and all rows once merge order is settled.Maintainership disclosure: I maintain MergeWarden, a checker in the layer-3 space discussed in #20/#22. This entry documents the project's policy only and makes no claim about any tool.