-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
Support multiple connections in the client mode. #2320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
OlivierHecart
merged 15 commits into
eclipse-zenoh:main
from
ZettaScaleLabs:support_multiclient
May 20, 2026
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6000ab0
Support multiple connections in the client mode.
evshary d764658
Fix clippy issue.
evshary cfe752d
Support no-std
evshary d8ef67d
Don't check the address.
evshary 940852f
Able to accept multiple connections from CLI
evshary 6688c80
Add tests for the client mode config.
evshary d9095ba
Add the usage inside the config file.
evshary 43854bc
Merge branch 'main' into support_multiclient
evshary d1abb0d
Revert the change in examples behaviors.
evshary 4316d55
Update the connect config format. Support object instead of array.
evshary 83cd651
Fix the Rust format issue
evshary a46b494
merge: sync main into support_multiclient
evshary 2405e55
test(connectivity): cover allOf locator groups
evshary 4f67d98
Merge branch 'main' into support_multiclient
evshary d4d7762
Merge branch 'main' into support_multiclient
evshary File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a change in behavior.
Coma separated values were already accepted here and were the equivalent of passing multiple
-earguments.Let's decide if:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally prefer the first one, while the second one will make usage complicated.
However, it's still fine with me if we decide on the second one.