Rename Maven module to avoid confusion with artifact id

[sbernard31]

See #1670 (comment) for more details.

[sbernard31]

Current Names are :

[INFO] leshan ............................................. SUCCESS [  0.905 s]
[INFO] leshan-shared build config ......................... SUCCESS [  0.043 s]
[INFO] leshan-shared library build config ................. SUCCESS [  0.305 s]
[INFO] leshan-core ........................................ SUCCESS [  0.082 s]
[INFO] leshan-client ...................................... SUCCESS [  0.019 s]
[INFO] leshan-servers-shared .............................. SUCCESS [  0.011 s]
[INFO] leshan-bsserver .................................... SUCCESS [  0.015 s]
[INFO] leshan-server ...................................... SUCCESS [  0.013 s]
[INFO] leshan-server redis ................................ SUCCESS [  0.022 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-shared ................ SUCCESS [  0.027 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-bsserver-coap ......... SUCCESS [  0.029 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-client-coap ........... SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-server-coap ........... SUCCESS [  0.011 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-shared oscore ......... SUCCESS [  0.015 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-bsserver-coap oscore .. SUCCESS [  0.012 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-client-coap oscore .... SUCCESS [  0.017 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-californium-server-coap oscore .... SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-javacoap-shared ................... SUCCESS [  0.008 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-javacoap-server-coap .............. SUCCESS [  0.009 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-javacoap-client-coap .............. SUCCESS [  0.061 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-javacoap-server-coap+tcp .......... SUCCESS [  0.037 s]
[INFO] leshan-transport-javacoap-client-coap+tcp .......... SUCCESS [  0.008 s]
[INFO] leshan-integration tests ........................... SUCCESS [  0.072 s]
[INFO] leshan-shared demo build config .................... SUCCESS [  0.005 s]
[INFO] leshan-demo-shared ................................. SUCCESS [  0.018 s]
[INFO] leshan-demo-client ................................. SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] leshan-demo-servers shared ......................... SUCCESS [  0.099 s]
[INFO] leshan-demo-server ................................. SUCCESS [  0.043 s]
[INFO] leshan-demo-bsserver ............................... SUCCESS [  0.018 s]

I agree that we probably should avoid that artifact name looks too much to artifact id
But I would like to keep how readability of each group of module (demo/transport Californium / Transport javacoap / ...)

So I propose something like :

[INFO] Leshan ............................................. SUCCESS [  0.905 s]
[INFO] Leshan shared build config ......................... SUCCESS [  0.043 s]
[INFO] Leshan shared library build config ................. SUCCESS [  0.305 s]
[INFO] Leshan core ........................................ SUCCESS [  0.082 s]
[INFO] Leshan Client ...................................... SUCCESS [  0.019 s]
[INFO] Leshan servers shared .............................. SUCCESS [  0.011 s]
[INFO] Leshan BS Server ................................... SUCCESS [  0.015 s]
[INFO] Leshan Server ...................................... SUCCESS [  0.013 s]
[INFO] Leshan Server Redis ................................ SUCCESS [  0.022 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium shared ................ SUCCESS [  0.027 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium BS Server coap ........ SUCCESS [  0.029 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium Client coap ........... SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium Server coap ........... SUCCESS [  0.011 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium shared oscore ......... SUCCESS [  0.015 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium BS Server coap oscore . SUCCESS [  0.012 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium Client coap oscore .... SUCCESS [  0.017 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport Californium Server coap oscore .... SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport javacoap shared ................... SUCCESS [  0.008 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport javacoap Server coap .............. SUCCESS [  0.009 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport javacoap Client coap .............. SUCCESS [  0.061 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport javacoap Server coap+tcp .......... SUCCESS [  0.037 s]
[INFO] Leshan Transport javacoap Client coap+tcp .......... SUCCESS [  0.008 s]
[INFO] Leshan Integration Tests ........................... SUCCESS [  0.072 s]
[INFO] Leshan shared demo build config .................... SUCCESS [  0.005 s]
[INFO] Leshan Demo shared ................................. SUCCESS [  0.018 s]
[INFO] Leshan Demo Client ................................. SUCCESS [  0.010 s]
[INFO] Leshan Demo servers shared ......................... SUCCESS [  0.099 s]
[INFO] Leshan Demo Server ................................. SUCCESS [  0.043 s]
[INFO] Leshan Demo BS Server .............................. SUCCESS [  0.018 s]

@jvermillard let me know if this is OK ? (Feel free to propose something else)

[jvermillard]

looks good, thanks!

[sbernard31]

it should be done by : #1687