-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Microprofile Health #25186
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add Microprofile Health #25186
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Wow, super cool! Just curious, how many of the TCK tests are passing at the moment? Maybe the manifest.mf file can be generated? It usually is, but I didn't check yet if you're doing anything special. Just a quick glance. |
Tests passed/Failed/Skipped: | 27/1/0 The main issue related to this failure is use of the Microprofile Config. As I'm creating a new As I understand, the correct use should be Related to the manifest, I had to change it to allow the use of a higher CDI version. I followed the pattern of the |
Another issue: right now I'm registering the Servlet as the following |
@Thihup, regarding "As I understand, the correct use should be ConfigProvider.getConfig(), but using it fails with No ConfigProviderResolver implementation found!", this is probably related to classloading or the order in which MP Health and Config are initialized. Config in GF is initialized in https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/blob/master/appserver/microprofile/config/src/main/java/org/glassfish/microprofile/config/ConfigDeployer.java. Maybe it happens after MP Health is initialized and thus Config is not yet available. If it's the case, we need to ensure that Health initializes after Config. Alternatively, refactor ConfigDeployer.java to extract the initialization into a separate method that initializes MP Config if it's not initialized, and call the method directly from the MP Health initializer or via a CDI event triggered from the Health initializer. I prepared something like that in my local branch with experiments related to MP Config, which I only have locally and haven't prepared as a PR yet:
And then |
You are absolutely right. I missed it being in a patches folder. (maybe for the future we can add some extension somewhere in OSGi so that we can more directly specify we allow higher versions, without patching the entire manifest) |
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
0544532
to
7d13b7d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Henrique Hüpner <[email protected]>
This change supports the deployment of MicroProfile Health 4.0 compatible applications, and modifies GF full profile to pass the MP Health 4.0.1 TCK by implementing the specification from scratch.
The MicroProfile Health uses the MicroProfile Config to check for two properties, so instead of requiring an explicit dependency,it handles the absence of the MP Config by returning a default value.
Currently this implementation does not add any default procedure.
Each application now contains four new endpoints:
/health
,/health/live
,/health/ready
and/health/started
.The TCK requires a single property (
mp.health.disable-default-procedures
) to be set (although currently unused by the implementation)