Require matching GUID prefix in SPDP/SEDP/PMD#2335
Merged
eboasson merged 1 commit intoeclipse-cyclonedds:masterfrom Jan 26, 2026
Merged
Require matching GUID prefix in SPDP/SEDP/PMD#2335eboasson merged 1 commit intoeclipse-cyclonedds:masterfrom
eboasson merged 1 commit intoeclipse-cyclonedds:masterfrom
Conversation
This prevents participant A from creating/deleting/renewing leases for entities of participant B, reducing the risk of mishaps caused by bugs in remote participants. The downside is that this prevents discovery from being delegated to a different participant. That capability wasn't actually being used anyway. If that capability is introduced, then in all likelihood some of the checks can remain in a slightly altered form. Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <eb@ilities.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This prevents participant A from creating/deleting/renewing leases for entities of participant B, reducing the risk of mishaps caused by bugs in remote participants.
The downside is that this prevents discovery from being delegated to a different participant. That capability wasn't actually being used anyway. If that capability is introduced, then in all likelihood some of the checks can remain in a slightly altered form.