{devel}[GCCcore-7.2.0] Doxygen v1.8.14 (with dependencies)#5902
Conversation
|
Test report by @rubendibattista |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rubendibattista We usually use the GCCcore toolchain for something like Doxygen, so that the resulting module is compatible with both foss and intel (among other toolchains that use GCCcore as a base).
92c21e9 to
72cec47
Compare
|
Test report by @rubendibattista |
|
Test report by @rubendibattista |
|
Test report by @rubendibattista |
|
@boegel Did not understand what's the problem with the automatic check... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rubendibattista You should include binutils 2.29 as a build dependency too when using GCCcore as toolchain (that's why the tests are failing).
72cec47 to
4251569
Compare
|
Should be ok now :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rubendibattista One of our most recent Doxygen easyconfigs also has pkg-config as build dep...
It's inconsistent with Doxygen 1.8.13, but can you check on this, and if pkg-config is indeed required include it here too?
Bonus point if you issue a separate PR to make pkg-config a build dep consistently in the Doxygen 1.8.13 easyconfigs... ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From Doxygen manual, pkg-config is not listed in the requirements: https://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/install.html
Am I misreading something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe @JackPerdue can clarify, it seems like he added this (cfr. #4953).
I can't find a reference to the use pkg-config anywhere in the build log for Doxygen...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll go ahead and get this merged, and open a PR to remove the pkg-config build dep in the other Doxygen easyconfig, it's wrong imho...
3cb6129 to
cb9a0db
Compare
w/ dependencies
cb9a0db to
eacc1bc
Compare
|
I rebased on upstream |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Going in, thanks @rubendibattista! |
|
Thanks for the help and support. |
(created using
eb --new-pr)