{chem}[foss/2024a] pyiron-gpl v0.0.5-20250512, pyiron v0.5.2-20250921, iodata v1.0.0a8 w/ mbocus#24007
Conversation
…yiron-0.5.2-2025-9-21-foss-2024a.eb, iodata-1.0.0a8-foss-2024a.eb
Updated software
|
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
…asyconfigs into 20250925170049_new_pr_pyiron-gpl00520250512
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 3433340372 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
|
|
||
| name = 'pyiron-gpl' | ||
| version = '0.0.5-20250512' | ||
| local_commit = 'd2d8680' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pavelToman There was an update of pyiron-gpl in https://github.com/mbocus/pyiron_gpl/tree/main which is worth picking up here.
Can you update this to latest current commit 5a3b6ef, using 20251021 in version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is not a good idea, new version needs numpy v2: https://github.com/mbocus/pyiron_gpl/blob/5a3b6ef5f3e530859fa42c1ee630fb5ce6c9de1e/setup.py#L32
So maybe for this new version will be better to create new easyconfig with newer toolchain?
Also pinned version of pyiron_atomistics==0.8.1 needs numpy v2 in this new version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But we do not have TensorFlow for newer toolchain - this was requested by the user to have TF with the same toolchain?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also latest pyiron needs new numpy v2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will go for foss/2025b toolchain with a new version of pyiron-gpl and pyiron, where is numpy v2.3.2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
|
Test report by @pavelToman |
…t require pybind11 as runtime dependency for pyscal3 extension
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 3645288362 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Going in, thanks @pavelToman! |
(created using
eb --new-pr)resolves vscentrum/vsc-software-stack#573
requires: