add patch to fix failing OCSP stapling test for IO::Socket::SSL extension in Perl-bundle-CPAN easyconfigs

[lorisercole]

The OCSP stapling tests run by the IO::Socket::SSL extension of Perl-bundle-CPAN started failing due to a change of behavior of the server contacted by these tests (see noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl#169).
A patch derived from noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl@58ad1d1 is applied to avoid this issue.

[Crivella]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--installpath /tmp/$USER/pr23030"

[boegelbot]

@Crivella: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23030 EB_ARGS="--installpath /tmp/$USER/pr23030" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23030 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 6603

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2940094302 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[Crivella]

Test report by @Crivella
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (4 easyconfigs in total)
crivella-desktop - Linux Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish), x86_64, 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K (skylake), Python 3.11.12
See https://gist.github.com/Crivella/006555d8c90f0ce09515562f134e7547 for a full test report.

[sassy-crick]

Test report by @sassy-crick
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
hp - Linux Debian GNU/Linux 12, x86_64, 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz, Python 3.11.2
See https://gist.github.com/sassy-crick/05f41f8bcc2819818481a01dbc393ad7 for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/6a19099185c8b1c85adaaa7f205b2f7c for a full test report.

[sassy-crick]

Strangely enough, it all works on our RHEL-8 cluster with the full test report being here

Test result

Build succeeded for 6 out of 6

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

• SUCCESS Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.36.1-GCCcore-12.3.0.eb
• SUCCESS Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.38.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb
• SUCCESS Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.38.2-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb
• SUCCESS groff-1.23.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.eb
• SUCCESS expat-2.6.4-GCCcore-14.2.0.eb
• SUCCESS Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.40.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.eb

Time info

• start: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 16:15:33 +0000 (UTC)
• end: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:58:08 +0000 (UTC)

EasyBuild info

• easybuild-framework version: 5.1.0
• easybuild-easyblocks version: 5.1.0
• command line:

eb --robot --download-timeout=100 --hooks=/rds/easybuild/hooks/cx3-phase2-hooks.py --rebuild --dump-test-report=/rds/general/user/jsassman/home/easybuild/perl-testbuild/report.md --from-pr 23030

[Crivella]

I think there is quite a bit of flakiness in the tests.
The one failing with the bot does not seem related to this at all (IO::Sockect::INET seems to be part of Perl itself while IO::Scoket::SSL is a separate package on github).

t/base/ua_handlers.t ........... ok

#   Failed test 'leaks 4866 <= 0'
#   at t/leak/no_leak.t line 22.
#     '4866'
#         <=
#     '0'
# leaked SCALAR(0x162cfb8) from /tmp/boegelbot/pr23030/software/Perl-bundle-CPAN/5.38.0-GCCcore-13.2.0/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.38.0/HTTP/Message.pm line 46.
#   45:    else {
#   46:	$header = HTTP::Headers->new;
#   47:    }
# SV = IV(0x162cfa8) at 0x162cfb8
#   REFCNT = 1
#   FLAGS = (IOK,pIOK)
#   IV = 19658712
# leaked SCALAR(0x162cc40) from /tmp/boegelbot/PerlbundleCPAN/5.38.0/GCCcore-13.2.0/LWPSimple/libwww-perl-6.72/blib/lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm line 1209.
# 1208:    $message ||= HTTP::Status::status_message($code);
# 1209:    my $response = HTTP::Response->new($code, $message);
# 1210:    $response->request($request);
# SV = IV(0x162cc30) at 0x162cc40
#   REFCNT = 1
#   FLAGS = (IOK,pIOK)
#   IV = 21012304
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
t/leak/no_leak.t ............... 
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/1 subtests 
t/local/autoload-get.t ......... ok
t/local/autoload.t ............. ok

[Crivella]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--installpath /tmp/$USER/pr23030 Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.38.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb"

[boegelbot]

@Crivella: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=23030 EB_ARGS="--installpath /tmp/$USER/pr23030 Perl-bundle-CPAN-5.38.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.eb" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_23030 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 6621

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2948954049 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/cf879d3896a36af435ec3e4f4ea7991c for a full test report.

[Crivella]

So #23030 (comment) is the test build that previously failed in #23030 (comment)

I think there is some serious flakyness in this tests but that is unrelated to this PR which is only applying the upstream patch to disable the OCSP test, i would be prone to merge this as is

[Crivella]

Also checked that the fingerprint has always been the same since 8 years ago, so no trouble using the same patch for all versions.

LGTM

[Crivella]

Going in, thanks @lorisercole!