Skip to content

{tools}[gfbf/2024a] wrapt v1.16.0#21695

Merged
smoors merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lcniel:20241017205317_new_pr_wrapt1160
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

{tools}[gfbf/2024a] wrapt v1.16.0#21695
smoors merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lcniel:20241017205317_new_pr_wrapt1160

Conversation

@lcniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lcniel lcniel commented Oct 17, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

@lcniel lcniel mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2024
3 tasks
@lcniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

lcniel commented Oct 17, 2024

Test report by @lcniel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
vera12-3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/lcniel/2c2ff563aa8865d2187333dbc951da42 for a full test report.

@smoors smoors added update 2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains labels Oct 18, 2024
@smoors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 18, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21695 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21695 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14520

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2421518245 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/63dbb574045574220d0ff4a48b5d9df0 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 18, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21695 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21695 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5118

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2421524900 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/85798441775a99ce2d6fdd940e783e1f for a full test report.

@smoors smoors added this to the release after 4.9.4 milestone Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 18, 2024

Going in, thanks @lcniel!

@smoors smoors merged commit 5a08adf into easybuilders:develop Oct 18, 2024
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: release after 4.9.4, 5.0.0 Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains update

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants