Skip to content

{data}[gfbf/2024a] dask v2024.9.1#21661

Merged
Micket merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lcniel:20241015181604_new_pr_dask202491
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

{data}[gfbf/2024a] dask v2024.9.1#21661
Micket merged 2 commits intoeasybuilders:developfrom
lcniel:20241015181604_new_pr_dask202491

Conversation

@lcniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lcniel lcniel commented Oct 15, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

Requires:

@Micket Micket added the update label Oct 16, 2024
@Micket Micket added this to the release after 4.9.4 milestone Oct 16, 2024
@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 16, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21661 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21661 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14499

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2417589453 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c6f59ac5c87f554e5f90920f165799b0 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 16, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21661 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21661 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5101

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2417658068 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/bf6c47369fd63a016b390e9269cf4b14 for a full test report.

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 16, 2024

Test report by @Micket
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
vera-skylake-build - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/Micket/b8e23d96644bbd9e1801cc37babb64f1 for a full test report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Micket Micket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

my impression is that dask-mpi is at least being phased out, and maybe this version already supports using SLURM backend directly instead. Worst case, we can revisit and add that module since that is easy to do with bundles.

@Micket
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Micket commented Oct 16, 2024

Going in, thanks @lcniel!

@Micket Micket merged commit b986db3 into easybuilders:develop Oct 16, 2024
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: release after 4.9.4, 5.0.0 Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants