{lib}[GCCcore/13.3.0] assimp v5.4.3, double-conversion v3.3.0, NSPR v4.35, ...#21574
Conversation
|
Test report by @maxim-masterov |
|
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2435748797 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2436082539 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
|
Test report by @SebastianAchilles |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
This test report failed with missing dependencies: |
|
@SebastianAchilles Yes, it was my bad. I didn't have time to re-generate the report after that. It takes almost 9 hours to build Qt6 on our system :| |
That is no problem. I just wanted to mention this, in case someone is wondering, why this test reported failed. I think we have enough test reports from different systems. |
SebastianAchilles
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few minor comments. I think the template SHLIB_EXT was removed. I think I have seen happening this before when using --insert-checksums. I think we should keep the SHLIB_EXT templates in the sanity checks.
easybuild/easyconfigs/d/double-conversion/double-conversion-3.3.0-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: SebastianAchilles <s.achilles@fz-juelich.de>
…3.0-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb Co-authored-by: SebastianAchilles <s.achilles@fz-juelich.de>
Co-authored-by: SebastianAchilles <s.achilles@fz-juelich.de>
Co-authored-by: SebastianAchilles <s.achilles@fz-juelich.de>
Co-authored-by: SebastianAchilles <s.achilles@fz-juelich.de>
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2438449494 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
snappy-1.1.10-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb was already added in #21660 I think it makes sense to use only on version for the GCCcore 13.3.0 toolchain. Do you think it is better to use 1.2.1 or would it also be okay to use 1.1.10? |
|
@SebastianAchilles I agree that it's logical to use one version. v1.2.1 should have better performance than v1.1.10, so I would stay with that version in 2024a. Also, v1.1.10 is over a year old and is already included in the 2023a and 2023b toolchains. I'm not sure if it makes sense to keep that version in 2024a. |
Thanks for the explanation. I agree that is makes sense to use v1.2.1 👍 |
|
Going in, thanks @maxim-masterov! |
(created using
eb --new-pr)