{ai}[foss/2023b] PyTorch v2.1.2#20171
Conversation
|
Don't we want to start working with pytorch 2.2? |
Indeed. However with #20156 we have just fixed the tests for this version so I started porting this to 2023b and see if anything goes wrong. If not, we can update to 2.2.1 and see what new stuff breaks there. I had bad experiences with updating the version and the toolchain at the same time |
e36d1ac to
e481b06
Compare
|
Test report by @casparvl |
|
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
|
@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2014681873 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
|
So, the three errors I see are all of the form: I'm not sure if that's something you recognize. It might be an issue on our system though: since recently, we have an issue with a memory leak in the kernel :\ |
|
Also, even though this counts as three failures, they all seem to be identical, just in different test files. So... I'm actually not to concerned with this - I consider it to be one failure, note three, and there's a reasonable chance it's due to our kernel. |
|
Just to double check: do you recognize this error @Flamefire ? |
Doesn't ring a bell for me. I'll (re)start the tests for this on our systems and if I don't see it on either I'd either increase the number of allowed failures or leave it to your site to ignore it. |
|
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3 |
|
@casparvl: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... Details- notification for comment with ID 2014990327 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Ok. Either way is fine by me btw. Let's see how things go on the test clusters. If those pass with the current amount of |
|
Test report by @Flamefire |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
Going in, thanks @Flamefire! |
|
Test report by @Flamefire |
(created using
eb --new-pr)