Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modify DL_POLY_Classic easyblock to support building with Plumed support (REVIEW) #829

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 2, 2016

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Feb 11, 2016

proper implementation of building DL_POLY Classic with PLUMED support, cfr. easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2126

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.7.0 milestone Feb 11, 2016
@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyblocks unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyblocks-pr-builder/1662/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel boegel modified the milestones: v2.7.0, v2.8.0 Mar 11, 2016
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: v2.8.0, v2.x May 10, 2016
@boegel boegel changed the title modify DL_POLY_Classic easyblock to support building with Plumed support (WIP) modify DL_POLY_Classic easyblock to support building with Plumed support (REVIEW) Dec 1, 2016
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 3.0.2, 3.x Dec 1, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 1, 2016

@wpoely86 please review

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 2, 2016

tested with easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#2126 and easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#3879, good to go, thanks for the review @wpoely86!

@boegel boegel merged commit 49c34c3 into easybuilders:develop Dec 2, 2016
@boegel boegel deleted the DL_POLY_Plumed branch December 2, 2016 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants