main - custom json serializers #88
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This is an interesting approach. I'll think about it. Part of me thinks you could just use the normal requests handlers for a custom serializer, but another part of me thinks JSON is special enough for this to be worthwhile. |
|
See #89 for a discussion. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I came up with a way not to drag new dependencies, while took goccy/go-json in projects, were we are using your library. Developer could use
SetJSONSerializers(gojson.Marshal, gojson.Unmarshal)in his main() function and enjoy faster json serialization/deserialization