Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[21267] Fix 2.6.x latency security XFAIL compilation without security #5037

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

Mario-DL
Copy link
Member

@Mario-DL Mario-DL commented Jul 8, 2024

Description

This PR fixes compilation of performance tests without security in 2.6.x, label latency tests with security in another file.

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • N/A Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
  • N/A Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.
  • N/A Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)
  • N/A Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.
  • N/A Changes are API compatible.
  • N/A New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).
  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • N/A If this is a critical bug fix, backports to the critical-only supported branches have been requested.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

@Mario-DL Mario-DL added this to the v2.6.10 milestone Jul 8, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Jul 8, 2024
@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

I am skipping all jobs and triggering a manual CI here without security and building tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

I am skipping all jobs and triggering a manual CI here without security and building tests.

CI passed, ready to merge

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved. and removed ci-pending PR which CI is running labels Jul 8, 2024
@EduPonz EduPonz merged commit 126cfda into 2.6.x Jul 9, 2024
16 of 24 checks passed
@EduPonz EduPonz deleted the bugfix/21267 branch July 9, 2024 05:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants