-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add client ids to system state #1581
Conversation
Victor-M-Giraldo
commented
Mar 29, 2024
- closes vis: add client ids to system state #1562
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Still need to actually fix the tests. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1581 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 61.3681% 61.3383% -0.0298%
================================================
Files 167 167
Lines 24705 24717 +12
Branches 1447 1447
================================================
Hits 15161 15161
- Misses 9488 9500 +12
Partials 56 56 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good so far.
Don't know if the unit test is really necessary, but I think this ones good. Edit: maybe not now that I look at the other displays again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is good for ott-vis-panel
, but ott-collector
and ott-balancer
still need to be updated accordingly.
Currently, it seems like the interop between the collector and the panel isn't being enforced in CI. Fixed in #1585
14ae111
to
2597bd2
Compare
Whoops, I made some changes earlier today that are conflicting. Sorry about that, I can rebase this for you if you want |
Yeah, sure. I tried to do it myself. There is only one conflict but the incoming change is an older version of the |
aae685b
to
c031bec
Compare
Done. This should be pretty easy to finish up |
Since |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah don't worry about global/region view. We're probably going to trash them.
Okay, but say if you did want to do that would you change |
Passing run #1507 ↗︎
Details:
Review all test suite changes for PR #1581 ↗︎ |
I would probably leave that count function as is and create a new one. |