Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor fix for chatty-users load test #1321

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

minor fix for chatty-users load test #1321

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

dyc3
Copy link
Owner

@dyc3 dyc3 commented Feb 12, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing load testing capabilities by significantly increasing concurrency through a higher number of Virtual Users (VUs) and refining error handling during room creation. These changes aim to improve the robustness and diagnostic capabilities of the testing framework.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.../chatty-users.js Increased VUs from 2 to 20, enhancing test concurrency.
.../utils.js Updated createRoom function to better handle room creation success and specific error cases.

🐇✨
In the digital meadow, beneath the code-filled sky,
Twenty rabbits now hop where once, only two did try.
They burrow through the data, with a keen, watchful eye,
Crafting rooms with care, where no error can lie.
So here's to the changes, may our tests always pass by,
With a hop, skip, and a jump, under the vast, digital sky.
🌟🐰

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e20ab4 and 6cb9131.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/load/chatty-users.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/load/utils.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
tests/load/chatty-users.js (1)
  • 8-8: Increasing VUs from 2 to 20 significantly raises the concurrency level. Ensure the testing infrastructure can handle this increased load without causing false negatives in test results.

tests/load/utils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/load/utils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +76 to +77
if (resp.status !== 201) {
console.log(`Failed to create room ${name}: ${resp.body}`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error logging here is appropriate. However, consider adding more context to the log, such as the response status code, for easier debugging.

- console.log(`Failed to create room ${name}: ${resp.body}`);
+ console.log(`Failed to create room ${name} with status ${resp.status}: ${resp.body}`);

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if (resp.status !== 201) {
console.log(`Failed to create room ${name}: ${resp.body}`);
if (resp.status !== 201) {
console.log(`Failed to create room ${name} with status ${resp.status}: ${resp.body}`);

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c3e9db6) 47.1805% compared to head (6cb9131) 47.1805%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master      #1321   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   47.1805%   47.1805%           
===========================================
  Files           148        148           
  Lines         17149      17149           
  Branches       1211       1211           
===========================================
  Hits           8091       8091           
  Misses         9058       9058           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

cypress bot commented Feb 12, 2024

1 failed test on run #941 ↗︎

1 62 1 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

Merge 6cb9131 into 9e20ab4...
Project: OpenTogetherTube Commit: 1e34cd4104 ℹ️
Status: Failed Duration: 03:00 💡
Started: Feb 12, 2024 5:50 PM Ended: Feb 12, 2024 5:53 PM
Failed  client/tests/e2e/component/Chat.cy.ts • 1 failed test • Component - electron

View Output Video

Test Artifacts
An uncaught error was detected outside of a test Screenshots Video

Review all test suite changes for PR #1321 ↗︎

@dyc3 dyc3 merged commit eb97bb1 into master Feb 12, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@dyc3 dyc3 deleted the fix-load-test branch February 12, 2024 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant