balancer: don't accept websocket connections if no monoliths are available #1276
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@dyc3 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- crates/ott-balancer/src/service.rs (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
crates/ott-balancer/src/service.rs (5)
- 123-131: The handling of the "list" room name as a special case is implemented correctly. This ensures that requests with the room name "list" are processed separately, addressing the PR's objective to manage special cases distinctly.
- 134-138: The check for the absence of monoliths before proceeding with the request handling is a critical addition. This directly addresses the issue documented in ci: dynamically collect code coverage reports #1248 by ensuring that websocket connections are not accepted when no monoliths are available, thereby preventing potential failures in connection management.
- 185-185: The use of the
no_monolithsfunction in the "room" handler when no monolith is available to process the request is appropriate. This aligns with the PR's objective to improve the reliability of the balancer by ensuring that connections are only accepted when backend services are available.- 205-205: Similarly, the use of the
no_monolithsfunction in the "other" handler when no monolith is available is consistent with the intended behavior of the balancer. This ensures that all types of requests are handled uniformly in scenarios where no backend services are available.- 230-237: The implementation of the
no_monolithsfunction correctly sets the HTTP status code toSERVICE_UNAVAILABLEand provides a clear message indicating the absence of monoliths to handle the request. This is a crucial part of the PR, ensuring that an appropriate response is returned when no monoliths are available, thereby enhancing the system's reliability.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1276 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 60.8976% 61.6130% +0.7154%
================================================
Files 118 118
Lines 9915 9485 -430
Branches 1158 1158
================================================
- Hits 6038 5844 -194
+ Misses 3877 3641 -236 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Passing run #886 ↗︎
Details:
Review all test suite changes for PR #1276 ↗︎ |
|||||||||||||||
fixes #1258