refactor: some of the unit tests for the user api

[dyc3]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update to the test suite introduces a more efficient approach to user registration testing. By utilizing parameterized tests, multiple scenarios are now covered under a unified structure, enhancing the test suite's readability and ease of management.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../api/user.spec.ts	Refactored user registration tests using it.each

🐇✨
To code we hop, with tests we play,
Streamlined checks, refactor's bouquet.
Bugs in the grass, they shy away,
'Neath the moon's silver ray, our code does sway. 🌙
✨🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b76b01 and 725e6d3.

Files selected for processing (1)

• server/tests/unit/api/user.spec.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

server/tests/unit/api/user.spec.ts (2)

• 345-380: The test cases for user registration have been refactored into a parameterized test structure using it.each. Ensure that the denyCases array covers all necessary test scenarios and that the structure [string, any, number, any][] is appropriate for the types of values being passed.
• 382-391: The refactored test uses it.each to iterate over denyCases. Verify that the error objects in denyCases match the expected error structure in the application and that the response codes are appropriate for each case. Additionally, confirm that the onUserLogInSpy is not called in scenarios where registration should be denied, as this indicates correct behavior.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (34beeaf) 61.5425% compared to head (725e6d3) 61.5711%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master      #1254        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   61.5425%   61.5711%   +0.0285%     
================================================
  Files           117        117                
  Lines          9413       9420         +7     
  Branches       1155       1158         +3     
================================================
+ Hits           5793       5800         +7     
  Misses         3620       3620                

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cypress]

Passing run #861 ↗︎

0

71

1

0

0

Details:

Merge 725e6d3 into 8b76b01...
Project: OpenTogetherTube	Commit: 206a4c8e6f ℹ️
Status: Passed	Duration: 03:18 💡
Started: Jan 23, 2024 12:01 AM	Ended: Jan 23, 2024 12:04 AM

Review all test suite changes for PR #1254 ↗︎