Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynasty sub-branches not lore-friendly #116

Closed
ajjr1996 opened this issue Jan 10, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Dynasty sub-branches not lore-friendly #116

ajjr1996 opened this issue Jan 10, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ajjr1996
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ajjr1996 ajjr1996 added the bug label Jan 10, 2019
@ajjr1996 ajjr1996 added this to the 0.10.1 milestone Jan 10, 2019
@ajjr1996
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We should make the sub-branch of the Radovid dynasty called "Trojan" not related to their dynasty making them seperate, since it's technically not lore friendly, same with Unicorn bloodline, they also have a sub-branch that's not lore-friendly that should probably also be unrelated as well.

@ajjr1996 ajjr1996 changed the title We should make the sub-branch of the Radovid dynasty called "Trojan" not related to their dynasty making them seperate, since it's technically not lore friendly, same with Unicorn bloodline, they also have a sub-branch that's not lore-friendly that should probably also be unrelated as well. Dynasty sub-branches not lore-friendly Jan 10, 2019
@rquinio
Copy link
Collaborator

rquinio commented Jan 10, 2019

Is it related to these cadet branches getting the bloodlines ? Maybe bastards could be excluded to these bloodlines, that would solve it.

@ajjr1996
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For sure I think that would be a good idea!

rquinio added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2019
- Add personality traits to some canon characters
- Disallow bastards for historical bloodlines #116
- Fix Bran not being King of Skellige on W2 timeframe
- Fix imperial elective in Nilfgaard title history, causing reset to feudal government
@rquinio rquinio closed this as completed Jan 13, 2019
@rquinio
Copy link
Collaborator

rquinio commented Jan 14, 2019

ajjr1996: "Hey I wasn't sure if I should open another issue for this so I thought I'd say it here. I was also looking and I'm not sure if not allowing bastards is a good idea anymore :( it didn't really go as I thought it would with the recent tweak of making the bloodlines unable to be inherited by bastards. It's really easy for the bloodlines to die out now since Henselt's kids and Foltest's are all bastards. I was kind of thinking more so on just editing the history and possibly making those cadet dynasties unrelated so they don't start with the bloodline."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants