-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynasty sub-branches not lore-friendly #116
Comments
We should make the sub-branch of the Radovid dynasty called "Trojan" not related to their dynasty making them seperate, since it's technically not lore friendly, same with Unicorn bloodline, they also have a sub-branch that's not lore-friendly that should probably also be unrelated as well. |
Is it related to these cadet branches getting the bloodlines ? Maybe bastards could be excluded to these bloodlines, that would solve it. |
For sure I think that would be a good idea! |
- Add personality traits to some canon characters - Disallow bastards for historical bloodlines #116 - Fix Bran not being King of Skellige on W2 timeframe - Fix imperial elective in Nilfgaard title history, causing reset to feudal government
ajjr1996: "Hey I wasn't sure if I should open another issue for this so I thought I'd say it here. I was also looking and I'm not sure if not allowing bastards is a good idea anymore :( it didn't really go as I thought it would with the recent tweak of making the bloodlines unable to be inherited by bastards. It's really easy for the bloodlines to die out now since Henselt's kids and Foltest's are all bastards. I was kind of thinking more so on just editing the history and possibly making those cadet dynasties unrelated so they don't start with the bloodline." |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: