Skip to content

Conversation

@matthewbayer
Copy link

Closes #178

@nicornk
Copy link

nicornk commented Dec 1, 2025

Would be great if this can be considered to close the gap in the python API.

evertlammerts
evertlammerts previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@evertlammerts evertlammerts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. if the checks pass we can merge.

@matthewbayer
Copy link
Author

Looks like we may need one more +1 since you committed here @evertlammerts - do you have anyone else I can tag in? Thanks!

@evertlammerts evertlammerts changed the base branch from main to v1.4-andium December 2, 2025 15:31
@evertlammerts
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebased onto v1.4-andium so this makes it into 1.4.3 (planned for next week)

@evertlammerts
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like we may need one more +1 since you committed here @evertlammerts - do you have anyone else I can tag in? Thanks!

No worries, when the tests pass I'll land it.

@matthewbayer
Copy link
Author

Amazing, thank you for your help and quick response! We are loving DuckDB and super impressed with performance.

@evertlammerts evertlammerts marked this pull request as draft December 2, 2025 18:44
@evertlammerts evertlammerts marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 18:44
@evertlammerts evertlammerts merged commit 7a0a181 into duckdb:v1.4-andium Dec 3, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants