feat: add support for specifying tables to be locked in ForUpdate, ForNoKeyUpdate, ForKeyShare, ForShare #299
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jbub
force-pushed
the
for-update-of
branch
3 times, most recently
from
0530bbd
to
21bda3c
Compare
jbub
changed the title
…rNoKeyUpdate, ForKeyShare, ForShare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the
ForUpdatemethod (and other locking methods) does not support specifying tables to be locked.As per docs this is the current dialect support:
This PR adds support for specifying tables to be locked to
ForUpdate,ForNoKeyUpdate,ForKeyShare,ForSharemethods.