Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
341 changes: 341 additions & 0 deletions plugins/dotnet/skills/dotnet-ai-ml/SKILL.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
---
name: dotnet-ai-ml
description: "Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI, Microsoft Agent Framework, GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and LLamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference)."

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
description: "Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI, Microsoft Agent Framework, GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and LLamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference)."
description: "Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework, GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and LLamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference)."

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

users might say MEAI (idk)

---

# .NET AI and Machine Learning

## Inputs

| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Task description | Yes | What the AI/ML feature should accomplish (e.g., "classify support tickets", "summarize documents") |
| Data description | Yes | Type and shape of input data (structured/tabular, unstructured text, images, mixed) |
| Deployment constraints | No | Cloud vs. local, latency SLO, cost budget, offline requirements |
| Existing project context | No | Current .csproj, existing packages, target framework |

## Workflow

### Step 1: Classify the task using the decision tree

Evaluate the developer's task against this decision tree and select the appropriate technology. State which branch applies and why.

| Task type | Technology | Rationale |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No mention of semantic kernel, whether to recommend use, or not.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is left out as this is a list of recommended choices

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we explicitly reject SK as an option?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will do. in rereading it fits well with the example of Accord.NET as well. also asked co-pilot and it agreed that it would be good to explicitly add

|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Structured/tabular data: classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation | **ML.NET** (`Microsoft.ML`) | Deterministic, reproducible, no cloud dependency, purpose-built for these tasks |
| Natural language understanding, generation, summarization, reasoning, workflow over unstructured text | **LLM via Microsoft.Extensions.AI** with **Microsoft Agent Framework** for orchestration | Requires language model capabilities beyond pattern matching |
| Building GitHub Copilot extensions, custom agents, or developer workflow tools | **GitHub Copilot SDK** (`GitHub.Copilot.SDK`) | Integrates with the Copilot agent runtime for IDE and CLI extensibility |
| Running a pre-trained or fine-tuned custom model in production | **ONNX Runtime** (`Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime`) | Hardware-accelerated inference, model-format agnostic |
| Local/offline LLM inference with no cloud dependency | **LLamaSharp** with quantized GGUF models | Privacy-sensitive, air-gapped, or cost-constrained scenarios |
| Semantic search, RAG, or embedding storage | **Microsoft.Extensions.VectorData.Abstractions** + a vector database provider (e.g., Azure AI Search, Milvus, MongoDB, pgvector, Pinecone, Qdrant, Redis, SQL) | Provider-agnostic abstractions for vector similarity search; pair with a database-specific connector package (many are moving to community toolkits) |
| Ingesting, chunking, and loading documents into a vector store | **Microsoft.Extensions.AI.DataIngestion** (preview) + MEVD | Handles document parsing, text chunking, embedding generation, and upserting into a vector database; pairs with Microsoft.Extensions.VectorData.Abstractions |
| Both structured ML predictions AND natural language reasoning | **Hybrid**: ML.NET for predictions + LLM for reasoning layer | Keep loosely coupled; ML.NET handles deterministic scoring, LLM adds explanation |

**Critical rule:** Do NOT use an LLM for tasks that ML.NET handles well (classification on tabular data, regression, clustering). LLMs are slower, more expensive, and non-deterministic for these tasks.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there also a rule that when using an LLM, extract anything that can be a script (eg., tabulation, math, stats) into code/script as it's both cheaper, more accurate and faster than LLM reasoning. maybe that's out of scope?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

interesting, this was geared towards augmenting code and the SDK choice as opposed to a workflow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm curious if @luisquintanilla has an opinio here. LLMs have been promoted (nont by us) for one-shot classification. I was really torn on this one.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would definitely be good to get Luis to review before merge.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the goal for this skill? This skill appears to provide guidance with various technologies that may have different patterns, practices, use-cases. While they are intended to compose together to build solutions, having them all in one place might confuse the coding assistant. It might be better to split up into separate skills and this skill can serve as a meta-skill that references to those respective skills.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe. experimentally this has added a lot of value as it is highly opinionated and helps to lead to more determinism when choosing between all our options. behind the choice of what SDK to choose, the models seems very effective. so beyond choosing a good starting point, I am not sure what the other split skills would do.


### Step 1b: Select the correct library layer

After identifying the task type, select the right library layer. These libraries form a stack — each builds on the one below it. Using the wrong layer is a major source of non-deterministic agent behavior.

| Layer | Library | NuGet package | Use when |
|-------|---------|---------------|----------|
| **Abstraction** | Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI) | `Microsoft.Extensions.AI` | You need a provider-agnostic interface for chat, embeddings, or tool calling. This is the foundation — always include it. Use it directly for simple prompt-in/response-out scenarios with no orchestration. |
| **Provider SDK** | OpenAI, Azure.AI.OpenAI, Azure.AI.Inference, OllamaSharp | `OpenAI`, `Azure.AI.OpenAI`, `Azure.AI.Inference`, `OllamaSharp` | You need a concrete LLM provider implementation. These wire into MEAI via `AddChatClient`. Use `OpenAI` for direct OpenAI access, `Azure.AI.OpenAI` for Azure OpenAI, `Azure.AI.Inference` for Azure AI Foundry / GitHub Models, or `OllamaSharp` for local Ollama. Use directly only if you need provider-specific features not exposed through MEAI. |
| **Orchestration** | Microsoft Agent Framework | `Microsoft.Agents.AI` (prerelease) | You need multi-step agent workflows, tool execution loops, multi-agent coordination, durable context, or graph-based workflows. Builds on top of MEAI. **Note:** This package is currently prerelease — use `dotnet add package Microsoft.Agents.AI --prerelease` to install it. |
| **Copilot integration** | GitHub Copilot SDK | `GitHub.Copilot.SDK` | You are building extensions or tools that integrate with the GitHub Copilot runtime — custom agents, IDE extensions, or developer workflow automation that leverages the Copilot agent platform. |

#### Decision rules for library selection

1. **Start with MEAI.** Every AI integration begins with `Microsoft.Extensions.AI` for the `IChatClient` / `IEmbeddingGenerator` abstractions. This ensures provider-swappability and testability.

2. **Add a provider SDK** (`OpenAI`, `Azure.AI.OpenAI`) as the concrete implementation behind MEAI. Do not call the provider SDK directly in business logic — always go through the MEAI abstraction.

3. **Add Agent Framework only when you need orchestration.** If the task is a single prompt → response, MEAI is sufficient. Add `Microsoft.Agents.AI` when you need:
- Tool/function calling loops (agent decides which tools to invoke)
- Multi-step reasoning with state carried across turns
- Multi-agent collaboration with handoff protocols
- Graph-based or durable workflows

4. **Add Copilot SDK only when building Copilot extensions.** Use `GitHub.Copilot.SDK` when the goal is to build a custom agent or tool that runs inside the GitHub Copilot platform (CLI, IDE, or Copilot Chat). This is not a general-purpose LLM orchestration library — it is specifically for Copilot extensibility.

5. **Never skip layers.** Do not use Agent Framework without MEAI underneath. Do not call `HttpClient` to OpenAI alongside MEAI in the same workflow. Each layer depends on the one below it.

### Step 2: Select packages and set up the project

Install only the packages needed for the selected technology branch. Do not mix competing abstractions.

#### Classic ML packages

```xml
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.ML" Version="4.*" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.ML.AutoML" Version="0.*" />
<!-- Only if custom numerical work is needed: -->
<PackageReference Include="MathNet.Numerics" Version="5.*" />
<!-- Only for data exploration: -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.Analysis" Version="0.*" />
```

> **Do NOT use** Accord.NET — it is archived and unmaintained.

#### Modern AI packages

```xml
<!-- Always start with the abstraction layer -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.AI" Version="9.*" />

<!-- Orchestration (agents, workflows, tools, memory) — prerelease; use dotnet add package Microsoft.Agents.AI --prerelease -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Agents.AI" Version="1.*-*" />

<!-- Cloud LLM provider (pick one) -->
<PackageReference Include="Azure.AI.OpenAI" Version="2.*" />
<!-- OR -->
<PackageReference Include="OpenAI" Version="2.*" />

<!-- Local LLM inference -->
<PackageReference Include="LLamaSharp" Version="0.*" />

<!-- Custom model inference -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime" Version="1.*" />

<!-- Vector store abstraction -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.VectorData.Abstractions" Version="9.*" />

<!-- Document ingestion, chunking, and vector store loading (preview) -->
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.AI.DataIngestion" Version="9.*-*" />

<!-- Copilot platform extensibility -->
<PackageReference Include="GitHub.Copilot.SDK" Version="1.*" />
```
Comment thread
jeffschwMSFT marked this conversation as resolved.

> **Stack coherence rule:** Never mix raw SDK calls (`HttpClient` to OpenAI) with `Microsoft.Extensions.AI`, Microsoft Agent Framework, or Copilot SDK in the same workflow. Pick one abstraction layer per workflow boundary and commit to it. See Step 1b for the layering rules.

#### Register services with dependency injection

All AI/ML services must be registered via DI. Never instantiate clients directly in business logic.

```csharp
// Configuration via IOptions<T>
services.Configure<AiOptions>(configuration.GetSection("AI"));

// Register the AI client through the abstraction
services.AddChatClient(builder => builder
.UseOpenAIChatClient("gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18"));
```

### Step 3: Implement with guardrails

Apply the guardrails for the selected technology branch. Every generated implementation must follow these rules.

#### Classic ML guardrails

1. **Reproducibility**: Always set a random seed in the ML context:
```csharp
var mlContext = new MLContext(seed: 42);
```

2. **Data splitting**: Always split into train/test (and optionally validation). Never evaluate on training data:
```csharp
var split = mlContext.Data.TrainTestSplit(data, testFraction: 0.2);
```

3. **Metrics logging**: Always compute and log evaluation metrics appropriate to the task:
```csharp
var metrics = mlContext.BinaryClassification.Evaluate(predictions);
logger.LogInformation("AUC: {Auc:F4}, F1: {F1:F4}", metrics.AreaUnderRocCurve, metrics.F1Score);
```

4. **AutoML first**: Prefer `mlContext.Auto()` for initial model selection, then refine manually.

5. **PredictionEngine pooling**: In ASP.NET Core, always use the pooled prediction engine — never a singleton:
```csharp
services.AddPredictionEnginePool<ModelInput, ModelOutput>()
.FromFile(modelPath);
```

#### LLM integration guardrails

1. **Temperature**: Always set explicitly. Use `0` for factual/deterministic tasks:
```csharp
var options = new ChatOptions
{
Temperature = 0f,
MaxOutputTokens = 1024,
};
```

2. **Structured output**: Always parse LLM output into strongly-typed objects with fallback handling:
```csharp
var result = await chatClient.GetResponseAsync<MySchema>(prompt, options, cancellationToken);
```

3. **Retry logic**: Always implement retry with exponential backoff:
```csharp
services.AddChatClient(builder => builder
.UseOpenAIChatClient(modelId)
.Use(new RetryingChatClient(maxRetries: 3)));
```

4. **Cost control**: Always estimate and log token usage. Choose the smallest model tier that meets quality requirements (e.g., `gpt-4o-mini` before `gpt-4o`).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to suggest how to log token usage? AFAIK our libraries already fire the right events, not sure the app needs to do anything but IDK

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems like MaxOutputTokens may be the key thing - mentioned already above

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've spoken with @stephentoub about this (not recently), and while this was a big ask 2 years ago, it's not so much a thing people focus on now.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what "this" is here. People still definitely compute token counts, in order to ensure they're not hitting token limits or hurting model performance or if they want to estimate or limit costs, but they have most of what they need to do that, and I see folks being ok with approximations more than absolute-to-the-token correct answers.


5. **Secret management**: Never hardcode API keys. Use Azure Key Vault, user-secrets, or environment variables:
```csharp
var apiKey = configuration["AI:ApiKey"]
?? throw new InvalidOperationException("AI:ApiKey not configured");
```

6. **Model version pinning**: Specify exact model versions to reduce behavioral drift:
```csharp
// Pin to a specific dated version, not just "gpt-4o"
var modelId = "gpt-4o-2024-08-06";
```

#### Agentic workflow guardrails

1. **Iteration limits**: Always cap agentic loops to prevent runaway execution:
```csharp
var settings = new AgentInvokeOptions
{
MaximumIterations = 10,
};
```

2. **Cost ceiling**: Implement a token budget per execution and terminate when reached.

3. **Observability**: Log every agent step — tool selected, input, output, and reasoning:
```csharp
await foreach (var message in agent.InvokeStreamingAsync(history, settings))
{
logger.LogDebug("Agent step: {Role} {Content}", message.Role, message.Content);
Comment thread
jeffschwMSFT marked this conversation as resolved.
}
```

4. **Tool schemas**: Define explicit tool/function schemas with descriptions. Never rely on implicit tool discovery.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and skills? don't know how these are surfaced

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think tool is synonymous with skill in this context. from the agent pov, skills are tools


5. **Simplicity preference**: Prefer single-agent with tools over multi-agent unless the task genuinely requires agent collaboration.

#### RAG guardrails

1. **Embedding caching**: Never re-embed the same content on every query. Cache embeddings in the vector store.

2. **Chunking strategy**: Use semantic chunking (split on paragraph/section boundaries) over fixed-size chunking. Ensure chunks have enough context to be useful on their own.

3. **Relevance thresholds**: Do not inject low-relevance chunks into context. Set a minimum similarity score:
```csharp
var results = await vectorStore.SearchAsync(query, new VectorSearchOptions
{
Top = 5,
MinimumScore = 0.75f,
});
```

4. **Source attribution**: Track which chunks contributed to the final response. Include source references in the output.

5. **Batch embeddings**: Batch embedding API calls where possible to reduce latency and cost.

### Step 4: Handle non-determinism

When the solution involves LLM calls or agentic workflows, explicitly address non-determinism:

1. **Acknowledge it**: Inform the developer that LLM outputs are non-deterministic even at temperature 0 (due to batching, quantization, and model updates).

2. **Validate outputs**: Implement schema validation and content assertion checks on every LLM response.

3. **Graceful degradation**: Design a fallback path for when the LLM returns unexpected, malformed, or empty output:
```csharp
var response = await chatClient.GetResponseAsync<ClassificationResult>(prompt, options);
if (response is null || !response.IsValid())
{
logger.LogWarning("LLM returned invalid response, falling back to rule-based classifier");
return ruleBasedClassifier.Classify(input);
}
```

4. **Evaluation harness**: For any prompt that will be iterated on, recommend creating a golden dataset and evaluation scaffold to measure prompt quality over time.

5. **Model version pinning**: Pin to specific dated model versions (e.g., `gpt-4o-2024-08-06`) to reduce drift between deployments.

### Step 5: Apply performance and cost controls

1. **Connection pooling**: Use `IHttpClientFactory` and DI-managed clients for all external services.

2. **Response caching**: Cache repeated or similar queries. Consider semantic caching for LLM responses where appropriate.

3. **Streaming**: Use `IAsyncEnumerable` for LLM responses in user-facing scenarios to reduce time-to-first-token:
```csharp
await foreach (var update in chatClient.GetStreamingResponseAsync(prompt, options))
{
yield return update.Text;
}
```

4. **Health checks**: Implement health checks for external AI service dependencies:
```csharp
services.AddHealthChecks()
.AddCheck<OpenAIHealthCheck>("openai");
```

5. **ML.NET prediction pooling**: In web applications, always use `PredictionEnginePool<TIn, TOut>`, never a single `PredictionEngine` instance (it is not thread-safe).

### Step 6: Validate the implementation

1. Build the project and verify no warnings:
```bash
dotnet build -c Release -warnaserror
```

2. Run tests, including integration tests that validate AI/ML behavior:
```bash
dotnet test -c Release
```

3. For ML.NET pipelines, verify that evaluation metrics meet the project's quality bar and that the model can be serialized and loaded correctly.

4. For LLM integrations, verify that structured output parsing handles both valid and malformed responses.

5. For RAG pipelines, verify that retrieval returns relevant results and that irrelevant chunks are filtered out.

## Validation

- [ ] Technology selection follows the decision tree — LLMs are not used for tasks ML.NET handles
- [ ] All AI/ML services are registered via dependency injection
- [ ] Configuration uses `IOptions<T>` pattern — no hardcoded values
- [ ] API keys are loaded from secure sources — not in source code or committed config files
- [ ] ML.NET pipelines set a random seed and split data for evaluation
- [ ] LLM calls set temperature, max tokens, and retry logic explicitly
- [ ] Agentic workflows have iteration limits and cost ceilings
- [ ] RAG pipelines implement chunking, relevance thresholds, and source attribution
- [ ] Non-deterministic outputs have validation and fallback paths
- [ ] `dotnet build -c Release -warnaserror` completes cleanly

## Anti-Patterns to Reject

When reviewing or generating code, flag and redirect the developer if any of these patterns are detected:

| Anti-pattern | Redirect |
|-------------|----------|
| Using an LLM for classification on structured/tabular data | Use ML.NET instead — it is faster, cheaper, and deterministic |
| Calling LLM APIs without retry or timeout logic | Add `RetryingChatClient` or Polly-based retry with exponential backoff |
| Storing API keys in `appsettings.json` committed to source control | Use user-secrets (dev), environment variables, or Azure Key Vault (prod) |
| Using Accord.NET for new projects | Migrate to ML.NET — Accord.NET is archived and unmaintained |
| Building custom neural networks in .NET from scratch | Use a pre-trained model via ONNX Runtime or call an LLM API |
| RAG without chunking strategy or relevance filtering | Implement semantic chunking and set a minimum similarity score threshold |
| Agentic loops without iteration limits or cost ceilings | Add `MaximumIterations` and a token budget ceiling |
| Mixing `Microsoft.Extensions.AI` with raw `HttpClient` calls to the same provider | Pick one abstraction layer and commit to it |
| Using Agent Framework for a single prompt→response call | Use MEAI `IChatClient` directly — Agent Framework is for multi-step orchestration |
| Using Copilot SDK for general-purpose LLM apps | Copilot SDK is for Copilot platform extensions only — use MEAI + Agent Framework for standalone apps |
| Calling OpenAI SDK directly in business logic instead of through MEAI | Register the provider via `AddChatClient` and depend on `IChatClient` in business code |
| Using `PredictionEngine` as a singleton in ASP.NET Core | Use `PredictionEnginePool<TIn, TOut>` — `PredictionEngine` is not thread-safe |
| Using `Func<ReadOnlySpan<T>>` for delegates with ref struct parameters | Define a custom delegate type — ref structs cannot be generic type arguments |
Comment thread
jeffschwMSFT marked this conversation as resolved.

## Common Pitfalls

| Pitfall | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Over-engineering with LLMs | Start with the simplest approach (rules, ML.NET) and add LLM capability only when simpler methods fall short |
| Evaluating ML models on training data | Always use `TrainTestSplit` and report metrics on the held-out test set |
| LLM output drift between deployments | Pin to specific dated model versions (e.g., `gpt-4o-2024-08-06`) |
| Token cost surprises | Set `MaxOutputTokens`, log token counts per request, and alert on budget thresholds |
| Non-reproducible ML training | Set `MLContext(seed: N)` and version your training data alongside the code |
| RAG returning irrelevant context | Set a minimum similarity score and limit the number of injected chunks |
| Cold start latency on ML.NET models | Pre-warm the `PredictionEnginePool` during application startup |
| Microsoft Agent Framework + raw OpenAI SDK in same class | Choose one orchestration layer per workflow boundary |
Loading