Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mono] Intrinsify multiple LoadVector API's #98077
[mono] Intrinsify multiple LoadVector API's #98077
Changes from 4 commits
b532aaa
c7ce20a
905f33b
4b011ab
2bbe476
7edc0aa
b543e0e
1e43ecf
c77dc71
4c637b7
0018853
b707469
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is this change about and why we have to track this separately? Mono supported APIs that takes pointers, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is related to calling LLVM intrinsics. Yes, Mono supports pointer type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are these custom names specific for mono? Can we write a comment for them because there will be more coming for store? Also, should
arm64_ldm
reused forLoadVector*
andLoadAndUnzip
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All the custom names used in this file are specific for Mono IR. For LLVM codegen, they follows similar logic, so I use the same string for both
LoadVector*
andLoadAndUnzip