Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.0] Remove jit-format job in .NET 7.0 branch #95422

Merged

Conversation

BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

Remove jit-format from outerloop pipeline in .NET 7 branch.

jit-format currently only works well in main. It is also not useful in servicing branches.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 29, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Remove jit-format from outerloop pipeline in .NET 7 branch.

jit-format currently only works well in main. It is also not useful in servicing branches.

Author: BruceForstall
Assignees: BruceForstall
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone: -

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member Author

@dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member Author

BruceForstall commented Nov 29, 2023

Contributes to #95159

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member Author

@carlossanlop

@BruceForstall BruceForstall added this to the 7.0.x milestone Nov 29, 2023
Copy link
Member

@carlossanlop carlossanlop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tell mode, approved.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Nov 29, 2023
@BruceForstall BruceForstall merged commit ff6db23 into dotnet:release/7.0-staging Nov 30, 2023
99 of 101 checks passed
@BruceForstall BruceForstall deleted the DisableJitFormatIn7 branch November 30, 2023 01:37
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants