-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 5.2k
Make Options source gen support Validation attributes having constructor with params Parameter #91915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
tarekgh
merged 2 commits into
dotnet:main
from
tarekgh:MakeOptionsSourceGenSupportValidationAttributesHaveConstructorsWithParams
Sep 12, 2023
Merged
Make Options source gen support Validation attributes having constructor with params Parameter #91915
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably too much of a niche scenario to consider here, but could this logic be tripped up by something like the following?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can consider that in .NET 9.0 as I want to limit the changes, we are porting to .NET 8.0.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's actually not a valid attribute parameter type if you want to apply the attribute (could be interesting for testing, but I gather this generator only observes applied attributes).
https://sharplab.io/#v2:D4AQTAjAsAUCDMACciCyBPAagQwDYEsATbAF3wHsA7AQRJICd8AjAVxIFNEAuRWh5tpwDesRGORIMOAsTJU+jVhwAUAB2z1sAWwDOifJRIBtALqnEANzwt2OgJSIhiAL6xXMWEal4ipCjTpFQWVKdgB3fUNzJwgAGkQwePhnOxNYBGQwNHQAFXRVdlgRGHcgA===
Attribute's parameters need to be represented in metadata and can only take a very limited set of types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I did recall that it's possible to nest arrays in attribute declarations, but it looks like it's only possible for
object[]parameters:https://sharplab.io/#v2:D4AQTAjAsAUCDMACciCyBPAagQwDYEsATbAF3wHsA7AQRJICd8AjAVxIFNEAuRWh5tpwDesRGORIMOAsTJU+jVhwAUAB2z1sAWwDOickwBW7AMYkA2gF1EANzwt2OgJSIhiAL6xPMWOal4iUgpKZUp2AHd9I1MLazcwyINjMytXRAgPDydLWARkMDR0ABV0VXZYERhvIA===
I think that case would work fine with the logic as-is, but maybe a test is in order?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see this was brought up here as well: #91934 (comment)