Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: don't trigger *all* library tests on wasm-only changes #81906

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

radical
Copy link
Member

@radical radical commented Feb 9, 2023

For wasm changes that should trigger wasm library tests, a different
subset is used.

This covers changes in, for example, eng/testing/ProvisioningVersions.props which is only used for wasm, it will trigger only wasm jobs.

For wasm changes that should trigger wasm library tests, a different
subset is used.
@radical radical added arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Infrastructure-mono labels Feb 9, 2023
@ghost ghost assigned radical Feb 9, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 9, 2023

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

For wasm changes that should trigger wasm library tests, a different
subset is used.

This covers changes in, for example, eng/testing/ProvisioningVersions.props which is only used for wasm, it will trigger only wasm jobs.

Author: radical
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm, area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone: -

@radical
Copy link
Member Author

radical commented Feb 9, 2023

Failures are #74838 and unrelated.

@radical
Copy link
Member Author

radical commented Feb 15, 2023

Failure is unrelated.

@radical radical merged commit 33e912d into dotnet:main Feb 15, 2023
@radical radical deleted the ci-path-fix branch February 15, 2023 19:19
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

Nice.

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants