-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new Task-based socket methods for UDP and reimplement existing ones using SocketAsyncEventArgs #47229
Conversation
# Conflicts: # src/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/ref/System.Net.Sockets.cs # src/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/SocketTaskExtensions.cs
@geoffkizer can you please take another look at the tests, and give a final approval if things look OK? I had to delete my SendTo cancellation test, since it looks like there is no reliable way to enforce I opened a bunch of issues for the corner cases discovered, and referenced them in my test workarounds. Most of them are minor compatibility cases, except the first one, which is actually concerning: #47342, #47335, #47469, #47425 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
src/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/tests/FunctionalTests/SendTo.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small nit above, otherwise LGTM.
/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Closes #41502, but does not change the existing APM methods, I plan to do it in a follow-up PR.
The PR is built on @geoffkizer's branch, almost all product code changes were written by him, I just added a bunch of tests, fixed an issue with Windows cancellation (4e4add1), and moved extension methods to the
Socket
class as per #43901.As such, the product code needs a third pair of yes to review. @stephentoub maybe?