Skip to content

Conversation

kendall1997
Copy link
Contributor

Tries to fix the format issues introduced by #115348.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 9, 2025 02:17
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses formatting issues introduced in a previous change by removing an extra blank line.

  • Removal of an unnecessary blank line in the switch-case block for intrinsic methods.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label May 9, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label May 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member

Just reformatting so going to merge early.

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS merged commit df1eba9 into dotnet:main May 9, 2025
104 of 110 checks passed
jakobbotsch added a commit to jakobbotsch/runtime that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
tannergooding pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
* Revert "JIT: Apply format suggested by automation (#115416)"

This reverts commit df1eba9.

* Revert "Vector128.WithElement codegen regression in .NET 9.0 (#115348)"

This reverts commit e42c072.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants