Skip to content

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #113384 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @steveisok

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

[Select one or both of the boxes. Describe how this issue impacts customers, citing the expected and actual behaviors and scope of the issue. If customer-reported, provide the issue number.]

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

Testing

[How was the fix verified? How was the issue missed previously? What tests were added?]

Risk

[High/Medium/Low. Justify the indication by mentioning how risks were measured and addressed.]

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9

IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.

@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstj
Copy link
Member

ericstj commented Mar 11, 2025

Do any of the tasks that use this ship in the product - and if so - can we guarantee that every VS version that supports 9.0 will have this update to MSBuild?

@steveisok
Copy link
Member

Do any of the tasks that use this ship in the product - and if so - can we guarantee that every VS version that supports 9.0 will have this update to MSBuild?

@akoeplinger indicated VS 17.4 has the 9 bump. Is that the min VS version for 9?

https://github.com/dotnet/msbuild/blob/vs17.14/src/MSBuild/app.config#L107-L110

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

Is that the min VS version for 9?

No:

image

@steveisok steveisok requested a review from ericstj March 25, 2025 19:28
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

carlossanlop commented Apr 2, 2025

@steveisok Friendly reminder that code complete is on April 14th for the May Release. If you'd like to get this change included in that release, please get a Tactics approval (if product change) and merge this PR before that date.

@jozkee
Copy link
Member

jozkee commented May 7, 2025

@steveisok friendly reminder that code complete is on Monday May 12th (2:00 PM Pacific) for the June Release. If you'd like to get this change included in that release, please get a Tactics approval and merge this PR before the deadline.

@jozkee
Copy link
Member

jozkee commented Jun 9, 2025

@steveisok reminder that servicing code complete for 9.0.7 is today @ 3PM PST.

@tarekgh
Copy link
Member

tarekgh commented Jul 10, 2025

@steveisok are you planning to have this in this servicing release? if so, please get this approved and merged soon.

Just reminder Code-complete is 14-Jul 4pm PT cut-off

@steveisok
Copy link
Member

@dotnet/runtime-infrastructure can one or more of you give this another review / sign-off?

Copy link
Member

@agocke agocke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@steveisok steveisok enabled auto-merge (squash) September 23, 2025 23:21
@steveisok
Copy link
Member

/ba-g timeouts

@steveisok steveisok added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 23, 2025
@steveisok steveisok merged commit 815ca89 into release/9.0-staging Sep 24, 2025
152 of 156 checks passed
@hoyosjs hoyosjs deleted the backport/pr-113384-to-release/9.0-staging branch September 24, 2025 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants