Skip to content

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Oct 15, 2024

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: f85f62c8-5e7d-4706-1003-08dcbc30275f
  • Build: 20241017.2
  • Date Produced: October 17, 2024 12:31:33 PM UTC
  • Commit: 5054dd35a56010d8f6232408e56e31ad8ccc987a
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/9.0

…15.4

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.1 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.4
@ghost ghost added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Oct 15, 2024
…17.2

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rtm.24515.4 -> To Version 9.0.0-rtm.24517.2
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Oct 17, 2024

@carlossanlop Merge if this is good to go.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

There are two host related failures I had not seen before and look related to stable branding. @NikolaMilosavljevic can you please take a look?

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Oct 17, 2024
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

@agocke @steveisok can you please help investigate the failures in host-related content in the installer subset? It's a couple of new failures I had not seen before and BuildAnalysis did not tag them to an existing issue.

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/108910/checks?check_run_id=31686024128

cc @vitek-karas and @VSadov but they're out for the day.

@agocke
Copy link
Member

agocke commented Oct 17, 2024

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Contributor

/ba-g The failure seems to indicate that 9.0.0 is expected but 9.0.0-ci is encountered. So the product is fine, but we need to adjust the version that is used in PRs, so that -ci is removed when the branch is stabilized.

I opened this issue to track the failure and unblock the build: #108994

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 776c015 into release/9.0 Oct 17, 2024
151 of 162 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/9.0-c2be55cb-490b-43b6-8ca2-762b75f83161 branch October 17, 2024 19:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants