-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Binary writer fix #107369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
koszeggy
wants to merge
9
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
koszeggy:BinaryWriterFix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+351
−16
Open
Binary writer fix #107369
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5c1a3ec
BinaryWriter: fixing Write(string) for derived types. Fixes #107265
koszeggy 80333be
Merge branch 'dotnet:main' into BinaryWriterFix
koszeggy 3f93285
Fixing build
koszeggy d97391b
Merge branch 'BinaryWriterFix' of https://github.com/koszeggy/runtime…
koszeggy 440f0be
Merge branch 'main' into BinaryWriterFix
koszeggy 3d21d94
Apply suggestion from code review
jeffhandley c6a4f61
Merge branch 'main' into BinaryWriterFix
jeffhandley 7fafa6e
Merge branch 'dotnet:main' into BinaryWriterFix
koszeggy ba1b351
BinaryWriter tests: checking derived reader/writer behavior (#107265)
koszeggy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@EgorBo How is runtime optimizing the logic that uses
GetType() == typeof(BinaryWriter)pattern as of today? Will this be always replaced with a constant for each derived type? If not, should we cache the result of the check? Or at least change the order (perform the cheap length check first)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a single pointer check (
*object == TypeTableOf(BinaryWriter)) and equivalent to accessing a field. This pattern is used a lot currently.