Getter only AutoProps - #979
Closed
pharring wants to merge 0 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
👍 |
Contributor
|
💡 I would prefer to see this rebased and squashed since the whole thing really is a single-topic change. On the unified diff, it's a 👍 from me. |
jjonescz
pushed a commit
to jjonescz/roslyn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2026
* Set LangVersion the same way as roslyn * Update commit link
This was referenced May 7, 2026
dibarbet
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2026
Add ReferenceAssemblies.Net.Net70
This was referenced Aug 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wrote an analyzer and code fix for finding opportunities to use getter-only auto properties in C#.
Then I ran it on core Roslyn components. This is the result. There's plenty more, but this should be enough for a first review.
The analyzer will eventually go into @DustinCampbell CSharpEssentials