-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Adjust implementation of user-defined conversion resolution according to the latest LDM decision #61754
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… to the latest LDM decision Closes dotnet#61470. Related to dotnet#56753.
|
@RikkiGibson, @333fred, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler Please review. |
2 similar comments
|
@RikkiGibson, @333fred, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler Please review. |
|
@RikkiGibson, @333fred, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler Please review. |
| [InlineData("implicit", true)] | ||
| [InlineData("explicit", false)] | ||
| [InlineData("explicit", true)] | ||
| public void ConsumeAbstractConversionOperator_11([CombinatorialValues("implicit", "explicit")] string op, bool needCast) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we remove CombinatorialValues?
nit: useCast would make more sense than needCast #Resolved
jcouv
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM Thanks (iteration 1)
|
@RikkiGibson, @333fred, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler For the second review. |
|
@RikkiGibson, @333fred, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler For the second review. |
|
@333fred, @RikkiGibson, @dotnet/roslyn-compiler For the second review. |
333fred
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (commit 2)
Closes #61470.
Related to #56753.
Test plan #60968