Skip to content
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<root>
<!--
Microsoft ResX Schema

<!--
Microsoft ResX Schema
Version 2.0

The primary goals of this format is to allow a simple XML format
that is mostly human readable. The generation and parsing of the
various data types are done through the TypeConverter classes
The primary goals of this format is to allow a simple XML format
that is mostly human readable. The generation and parsing of the
various data types are done through the TypeConverter classes
associated with the data types.

Example:

... ado.net/XML headers & schema ...
<resheader name="resmimetype">text/microsoft-resx</resheader>
<resheader name="version">2.0</resheader>
Expand All @@ -26,36 +26,36 @@
<value>[base64 mime encoded string representing a byte array form of the .NET Framework object]</value>
<comment>This is a comment</comment>
</data>

There are any number of "resheader" rows that contain simple
There are any number of "resheader" rows that contain simple
name/value pairs.

Each data row contains a name, and value. The row also contains a
type or mimetype. Type corresponds to a .NET class that support
text/value conversion through the TypeConverter architecture.
Classes that don't support this are serialized and stored with the
Each data row contains a name, and value. The row also contains a
type or mimetype. Type corresponds to a .NET class that support
text/value conversion through the TypeConverter architecture.
Classes that don't support this are serialized and stored with the
mimetype set.

The mimetype is used for serialized objects, and tells the
ResXResourceReader how to depersist the object. This is currently not
The mimetype is used for serialized objects, and tells the
ResXResourceReader how to depersist the object. This is currently not
extensible. For a given mimetype the value must be set accordingly:

Note - application/x-microsoft.net.object.binary.base64 is the format
that the ResXResourceWriter will generate, however the reader can
Note - application/x-microsoft.net.object.binary.base64 is the format
that the ResXResourceWriter will generate, however the reader can
read any of the formats listed below.

mimetype: application/x-microsoft.net.object.binary.base64
value : The object must be serialized with
value : The object must be serialized with
: System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.BinaryFormatter
: and then encoded with base64 encoding.

mimetype: application/x-microsoft.net.object.soap.base64
value : The object must be serialized with
value : The object must be serialized with
: System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Soap.SoapFormatter
: and then encoded with base64 encoding.

mimetype: application/x-microsoft.net.object.bytearray.base64
value : The object must be serialized into a byte array
value : The object must be serialized into a byte array
: using a System.ComponentModel.TypeConverter
: and then encoded with base64 encoding.
-->
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -342,8 +342,8 @@
<data name="ProvideCorrectArgumentsToFormattingMethodsDescription" xml:space="preserve">
<value>The format argument that is passed to System.String.Format does not contain a format item that corresponds to each object argument, or vice versa.</value>
</data>
<data name="ProvideCorrectArgumentsToFormattingMethodsMessage" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Provide correct arguments to formatting methods</value>
<data name="ProvideCorrectArgumentsToFormattingMethodsMessageArgs" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Incorrect number of arguments passed to this formatting method call</value>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to add how many params are expected and how many were passed?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This sounds like a great idea

</data>
<data name="TestForNaNCorrectlyTitle" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Test for NaN correctly</value>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1482,4 +1482,7 @@
<data name="PreferStringContainsOverIndexOfCodeFixTitle" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Replace with 'string.Contains'</value>
</data>
<data name="ProvideCorrectArgumentsToFormattingMethodsMessageFormatItem" xml:space="preserve">
<value>Some string format items are missing from this formatting method call</value>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if it brings much to add the missing indexes, WDYT?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering we will "squiggle" the entire thing I think some text explaining how to fix what is wrong would help. Saying

"Some string format items are missing from this formatting method call. Nothing was passed for index '0'"

</data>
</root>
Loading