-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Fixed the TextTransform bug where chargrams where being computed differently when using with/without word tokenizer. #548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
868a72f
f482eea
64390ee
2201433
d1dd161
f458cdb
90cdf2a
3ed6e87
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -64,12 +64,13 @@ public sealed class Arguments : TransformInputBase | |
| public const string LoaderSignature = "CharToken"; | ||
| public const string UserName = "Character Tokenizer Transform"; | ||
|
|
||
| public static uint CurrentModelVersion = 0x00010002; | ||
| private static VersionInfo GetVersionInfo() | ||
| { | ||
| return new VersionInfo( | ||
| modelSignature: "CHARTOKN", | ||
| verWrittenCur: 0x00010001, // Initial | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See other examples. You will see that we keep commented out the version strings from old versions, to track them and so we know why we bumped the version each time. This is important: we have live code in our deserializers that is meant to handle those version bumps, and for that reason we like to have documentation on what exactly changed, so that when we have tests on this or that version in our deserializers, we know why they changed. #Resolved |
||
| verReadableCur: 0x00010001, | ||
| verWrittenCur: CurrentModelVersion, | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please refer to other components where we bumped the version number. (If I search for |
||
| verReadableCur: CurrentModelVersion, | ||
| verWeCanReadBack: 0x00010001, | ||
| loaderSignature: LoaderSignature); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ private static VersionInfo GetVersionInfo() | |
| private volatile string _keyValuesStr; | ||
| private volatile int[] _keyValuesBoundaries; | ||
|
|
||
| private const ushort UnitSeparator = 0x1f; | ||
| private const ushort TextStartMarker = 0x02; | ||
| private const ushort TextEndMarker = 0x03; | ||
| private const int TextMarkersCount = 2; | ||
|
|
@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ private CharTokenizeTransform(IHost host, ModelLoadContext ctx, IDataView input) | |
| // <base> | ||
| // byte: _useMarkerChars value. | ||
| _useMarkerChars = ctx.Reader.ReadBoolByte(); | ||
| CurrentModelVersion = ctx.Header.ModelVerReadable; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see what you've done here.. this is not good, static variables are essentially global state. They are not particular to an instance. #Resolved |
||
|
|
||
| _type = GetOutputColumnType(); | ||
| SetMetadata(); | ||
|
|
@@ -397,10 +400,11 @@ private ValueGetter<VBuffer<ushort>> MakeGetterVec(IRow input, int iinfo) | |
| int cv = Infos[iinfo].TypeSrc.VectorSize; | ||
| Contracts.Assert(cv >= 0); | ||
|
|
||
| var version = GetVersionInfo(); | ||
| var getSrc = GetSrcGetter<VBuffer<DvText>>(input, iinfo); | ||
| var src = default(VBuffer<DvText>); | ||
| return | ||
| (ref VBuffer<ushort> dst) => | ||
|
|
||
| ValueGetter<VBuffer<ushort>> valueGetterOldVersion = (ref VBuffer<ushort> dst) => | ||
| { | ||
| getSrc(ref src); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -438,6 +442,67 @@ private ValueGetter<VBuffer<ushort>> MakeGetterVec(IRow input, int iinfo) | |
|
|
||
| dst = new VBuffer<ushort>(len, values, dst.Indices); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| ValueGetter < VBuffer<ushort> > valueGetterCurrentVersion = (ref VBuffer<ushort> dst) => | ||
| { | ||
| getSrc(ref src); | ||
|
|
||
| int len = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| for (int i = 0; i < src.Count; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| if (src.Values[i].HasChars) | ||
| { | ||
| len += src.Values[i].Length; | ||
|
|
||
| if (i > 0) | ||
| len += 1; // add UnitSeparator character to len that will be added | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (_useMarkerChars) | ||
| len += TextMarkersCount; | ||
|
|
||
| var values = dst.Values; | ||
| if (len > 0) | ||
| { | ||
| if (Utils.Size(values) < len) | ||
| values = new ushort[len]; | ||
|
|
||
| int index = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| // VBuffer<DvText> can be a result of either concatenating text columns together | ||
| // or application of word tokenizer before char tokenizer in TextTransform. | ||
| // | ||
| // Considering VBuffer<DvText> as a single text stream. | ||
| // Therefore, prepend and append start and end markers only once i.e. at the start and at end of vector. | ||
| // Insert UnitSeparator after every piece of text in the vector. | ||
| if (_useMarkerChars) | ||
| values[index++] = TextStartMarker; | ||
|
|
||
| for (int i = 0; i < src.Count; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!src.Values[i].HasChars) | ||
| continue; | ||
|
|
||
| if (i > 0) | ||
| values[index++] = UnitSeparator; | ||
|
|
||
| for (int ich = 0; ich < src.Values[i].Length; ich++) | ||
| { | ||
| values[index++] = src.Values[i][ich]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (_useMarkerChars) | ||
| values[index++] = TextEndMarker; | ||
|
|
||
| Contracts.Assert(index == len); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| dst = new VBuffer<ushort>(len, values, dst.Indices); | ||
| }; | ||
| return CurrentModelVersion < version.VerReadableCur ? valueGetterOldVersion : valueGetterCurrentVersion; | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @TomFinley and @Ivanidzo4ka, Is this correct way to maintain backward compatibility? #Resolved
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not exactly. For one thing you've stored this in a static variable, which is not correct, since this behavior will be specific to the instance. So if you read two instances of the transform, one with the old version, one with the new version, you'd break one or the other (depending on the order in which you read them). As a general rule, not just in ML.NET but in any coding anywhere, storing instance specific data inside a static variable is generally a bad idea. :) For the sake of resaving an old model to the new format, you ought to store a boolean variable in the new version of the file, to control whether it is the old or new version. So the saver will have If anything about that is not clear let me know, thanks @zeahmed! In reply to: 203896119 [](ancestors = 203896119) |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -262,6 +262,30 @@ public static IDataTransform Create(IHostEnvironment env, Arguments args, IDataV | |
| view = new ConcatTransform(h, new ConcatTransform.Arguments() { Column = xfCols }, view); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (tparams.NeedsNormalizeTransform) | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @justinormont, I moved
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't know if there are averse effects of running If you make me a build, I'll run a manual regression test. Unfortunately we don't currently have running nightly regression tests to tell us if the text datasets decreased in their core metrics. #Resolved
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't like this change. It's far from clear to me that if someone asks to remove stopwords that they meant for the content of stopwords to be retained in the chargrams. At the very least this ought to be a configurable option. In reply to: 204000786 [](ancestors = 204000786)
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @TomFinley, Can you elaborate more on this? Your point is not clear to me. Don't you see it good to have In reply to: 204201054 [](ancestors = 204201054,204000786)
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry thought you were saying something else for some reason got confused. #Resolved |
||
| { | ||
| var xfCols = new TextNormalizerCol[textCols.Length]; | ||
| string[] dstCols = new string[textCols.Length]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < textCols.Length; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| dstCols[i] = GenerateColumnName(view.Schema, textCols[i], "TextNormalizer"); | ||
| tempCols.Add(dstCols[i]); | ||
| xfCols[i] = new TextNormalizerCol() { Source = textCols[i], Name = dstCols[i] }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| view = new TextNormalizerTransform(h, | ||
| new TextNormalizerArgs() | ||
| { | ||
| Column = xfCols, | ||
| KeepDiacritics = tparams.KeepDiacritics, | ||
| KeepNumbers = tparams.KeepNumbers, | ||
| KeepPunctuations = tparams.KeepPunctuations, | ||
| TextCase = tparams.TextCase | ||
| }, view); | ||
|
|
||
| textCols = dstCols; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (tparams.NeedsWordTokenizationTransform) | ||
| { | ||
| var xfCols = new DelimitedTokenizeTransform.Column[textCols.Length]; | ||
|
|
@@ -281,34 +305,6 @@ public static IDataTransform Create(IHostEnvironment env, Arguments args, IDataV | |
| view = new DelimitedTokenizeTransform(h, new DelimitedTokenizeTransform.Arguments() { Column = xfCols }, view); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (tparams.NeedsNormalizeTransform) | ||
| { | ||
| string[] srcCols = wordTokCols == null ? textCols : wordTokCols; | ||
| var xfCols = new TextNormalizerCol[srcCols.Length]; | ||
| string[] dstCols = new string[srcCols.Length]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < srcCols.Length; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| dstCols[i] = GenerateColumnName(view.Schema, srcCols[i], "TextNormalizer"); | ||
| tempCols.Add(dstCols[i]); | ||
| xfCols[i] = new TextNormalizerCol() { Source = srcCols[i], Name = dstCols[i] }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| view = new TextNormalizerTransform(h, | ||
| new TextNormalizerArgs() | ||
| { | ||
| Column = xfCols, | ||
| KeepDiacritics = tparams.KeepDiacritics, | ||
| KeepNumbers = tparams.KeepNumbers, | ||
| KeepPunctuations = tparams.KeepPunctuations, | ||
| TextCase = tparams.TextCase | ||
| }, view); | ||
|
|
||
| if (wordTokCols != null) | ||
| wordTokCols = dstCols; | ||
| else | ||
| textCols = dstCols; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (tparams.NeedsRemoveStopwordsTransform) | ||
| { | ||
| Contracts.Assert(wordTokCols != null, "StopWords transform requires that word tokenization has been applied to the input text."); | ||
|
|
@@ -360,7 +356,7 @@ public static IDataTransform Create(IHostEnvironment env, Arguments args, IDataV | |
| if (tparams.CharExtractorFactory != null) | ||
| { | ||
| { | ||
| var srcCols = wordTokCols ?? textCols; | ||
| var srcCols = tparams.NeedsRemoveStopwordsTransform ? wordTokCols : textCols; | ||
| charTokCols = new string[srcCols.Length]; | ||
| var xfCols = new CharTokenizeTransform.Column[srcCols.Length]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < srcCols.Length; i++) | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm. Just to clarify something, because having this be a constant is essential for the correctness of your serialization and deserialization routines, turning it into a public static mutable field is probably not a good idea.
I question the worth of making this variable * at all*, but even if you should please don't make this public, and this should definitely be a
const. Also "current" version is not descriptive. It is the version where you changed the behavior of the separating characters to be the single character<US>vs having start and end characters. If you really want a variable, it should be something likeVariableSeparatorIsUnitSeparatoror somesuch to actually describe what version0x00010002is. But again I'd question how much worth such a const as this would provide. #Resolved