StopWordsRemovingEstimator export to Onnx#5279
Conversation
| { | ||
| var opType = "Squeeze"; | ||
| var squeezeOutput = ctx.AddIntermediateVariable(null, "SqueezeOutput", true); | ||
| var node = ctx.CreateNode(opType, srcVariableName, squeezeOutput, ctx.GetNodeName(opType), ""); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it possible to avoid skipping the shape and type addition? #Resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason I skipped the shape is because the shape of the tokenized word vector is not known prior to inference time. The number of words tokenized may be any number. #Resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other text transformers that also infer shape:
| var opType = "Squeeze"; | ||
| var squeezeOutput = ctx.AddIntermediateVariable(null, "SqueezeOutput", true); | ||
| var node = ctx.CreateNode(opType, srcVariableName, squeezeOutput, ctx.GetNodeName(opType), ""); | ||
| node.AddAttribute("axes", new long[] { 0 }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not in this PR, but in a different PR it maybe worth considering changing the default domain for CreateNode to be "ai.onnx" and not "ai.onnx.ml". The latter has very few ops and we mostly use operators from "ai.onnx" and it makes sense to retain that as the default.
|
Can you check whether the number of elements returned is the same? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5279 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.68% 73.68%
=======================================
Files 1022 1022
Lines 190366 190348 -18
Branches 20474 20472 -2
=======================================
+ Hits 140265 140267 +2
+ Misses 44568 44548 -20
Partials 5533 5533
|
I think this already done as part of the onnx testing framework: |
|
Can you reshape the returned vector in SaveAsOnnx to be compatible with ML.NET? In reply to: 653235748 [](ancestors = 653235748) |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
2 participants
Note: The decision was address the issue mentioned above in another PR.