Skip to content

Conversation

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Draft PR to test the tarball build with the latest product changes to remove prebuilts prior to them flowing in.

@lbussell
Copy link
Member

lbussell commented Aug 24, 2022

The tarball should build without any 6.0 prebuilts now.

Don't merge currently, as I pulled in vstest changes proactively before the PR gets merged. The vstest change doesn't work as a patch, I think because of deleted/moved files.

@lbussell
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Pull request contains merge conflicts.

@lbussell lbussell force-pushed the 7.0-zero-prebuilts branch from c9384cf to 106bec4 Compare August 25, 2022 19:12
<RepositoryReference Include="diagnostics" />
<RepositoryReference Include="llvm-project" />
<RepositoryReference Include="razor-compiler" />
<RepositoryReference Include="xliff-tasks" />
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider making a separate PR to check in these changes since ideally this PR would be abandoned because all the patches would get backported.

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member Author

I just merged in the PR into installer that brought in a newer xliff-tasks version to eliminate it's prebuilts. I proactively merged those changes into this PR and removed the patch for it. There were two other patches backported as well that got picked up.

@lbussell lbussell marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2022 23:09
@lbussell lbussell requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2022 23:09
@lbussell lbussell enabled auto-merge (squash) September 13, 2022 16:56
@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member Author

I can't "approve" this via the GH control because I am the author. It does LGTM.

@lbussell lbussell merged commit 8a0eb58 into dotnet:release/7.0.1xx Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants