-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make Projection_AsEnumerable_projection deterministic #26285
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not required. The collection is unordered by design. The result assertion will (or should) sort it before checking results.
@smitpatel can you say how you'd like this to be fixed? The test has |
The assert order is to make sure that the customer (outer type) is sorted since query specify sort order on it. The inner element or the result is collection of orders without any window and order by so it should be just collection of orders without any ordering. So the query does not need update. You need to update the code to verify result to do matching of 2 unordered collection. |
@@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ public virtual Task Projection_AsEnumerable_projection(bool async) | |||
ss => ss.Set<Customer>() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return AssertQuery(
async,
ss => ss.Set<Customer>()
.Where(c => c.CustomerID.StartsWith("A"))
.OrderBy(c => c.CustomerID)
.Select(c => ss.Set<Order>().Where(o => o.CustomerID == c.CustomerID).AsEnumerable())
.Where(e => e.Where(o => o.OrderID < 11000).Count() > 0)
.Select(e => e.Where(o => o.OrderID < 10750)),
assertOrder: true,
elementAsserter: (e, a) => AssertCollection(e, a, elementSorter: ee => ee.OrderID),
entryCount: 18);
b1a19e9
to
cf40d37
Compare
Hello @roji! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:
These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check. Give feedback on thisFrom the bot dev teamWe've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments. Please reach out to us at [email protected] to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin. |
No description provided.