Skip to content

Conversation

@jjonescz
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jjonescz jjonescz merged commit 240d585 into dotnet:main Jan 23, 2025
1 check passed
@jjonescz jjonescz deleted the PartialEventsCtorsSpec-02 branch January 23, 2025 17:00
```

Do we want to keep this behavior or can we break here and simplify the parser?
If we break, the workaround for users is to use `@partial` for the return type of the method as well.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: searching github, i don't see any hits for partial identifier(. So it seems unlikely that peopel are doing this. Similar to how we've carved out other identifiers and stated we will only interpret them as a modifier and not a type (record, scoped, etc.) this feels very much in line with going the same route.

Esp. given no matches in the wild, this seems safe and sane.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, there is a little while until next LDM, perhaps we should float this question by email.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would be fine with email :) @jjonescz do you want to send?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants