Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Experimental] Add alternative way of resolving UCO function pointers for Marshal Methods #9805
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Experimental] Add alternative way of resolving UCO function pointers for Marshal Methods #9805
Changes from all commits
94d9a7b
408d8f6
6c039cd
9acc534
d1df4af
7667cf4
12e6a01
8f080e1
25580eb
4f5a234
5f26f54
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did not observe any functional changes when swapping the order of
AddSpecialCaseMethods
andRewriteMarshalMethods
. I also don't see a reason that the code inAddSpecialCaseMethods
could not run beforeRewriteMarshalMethods
. Nevertheless, I thought it might not be a good idea to change the existing behavior and only change the order when this (experimental) feature is enabled.