-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 166
Mark ternary macros that can be evaluated as constants as const #221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -300,5 +300,25 @@ public static partial class Methods | |
|
|
||
| return ValidateGeneratedCSharpCompatibleUnixBindingsAsync(inputContents, expectedOutputContents); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public override Task ConditionalDefineConstTest() | ||
| { | ||
| var inputContents = @"typedef int TESTRESULT; | ||
| #define TESTRESULT_FROM_WIN32(x) ((TESTRESULT)(x) <= 0 ? ((TESTRESULT)(x)) : ((TESTRESULT) (((x) & 0x0000FFFF) | (7 << 16) | 0x80000000))) | ||
| #define ADDRESS_IN_USE TESTRESULT_FROM_WIN32(10048)"; | ||
|
|
||
| var expectedOutputContents = $@"namespace ClangSharp.Test | ||
| {{ | ||
| public static partial class Methods | ||
| {{ | ||
| [NativeTypeName(""#define ADDRESS_IN_USE TESTRESULT_FROM_WIN32(10048)"")] | ||
| public const int ADDRESS_IN_USE = unchecked((int)(10048) <= 0 ? ((int)(10048)) : ((int)(((10048) & 0x0000FFFF) | (7 << 16) | 0x80000000))); | ||
| }} | ||
| }} | ||
| "; | ||
| var diagnostics = new Diagnostic[] { new Diagnostic(DiagnosticLevel.Warning, "Function like macro definition records are not supported: 'TESTRESULT_FROM_WIN32'. Generated bindings may be incomplete.", "Line 2, Column 9 in ClangUnsavedFile.h") }; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is there a better way to do this? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not really, this is about how everything works for validating diagnostics. |
||
|
|
||
| return ValidateGeneratedCSharpCompatibleUnixBindingsAsync(inputContents, expectedOutputContents, expectedDiagnostics: diagnostics); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: This isn't quite right. If
IsConstant(conditionalOperator.Cond)istrueand the evaluated value ofCondistrue, then onlyIsConstant(conditionalOperator.LHS)needs to betrue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a ? b :cdoes that meanCondisaandLHSisb : c? Otherwise confused by why only 2 of the 3 would need to be true.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code doesn't check that
Condevaluates to true. It just checks that it evaluates to a constant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cond ? LHS : RHSx = cond ? LHS : RHSis basically shorthand for:So if you have
x = trueCond ? 5 : sqrt(globalValue), then you want it to still evaluate to be "constant". As it is now, it won't sinceIsConstant(conditionalOperator.RHS)will returnfalseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Likewise if you had
x = falseCond ? sqrt(globalValue) : 5, you want it to evaluate as constant whileIsConstant(conditionalOperator.LHS)will be the only thing to returnfalseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the generator actually generates the ternary even if the
Condis constant, wouldn't the current impl need both LHS and RHS to be true? I agree if the generator actually lowered the ternary then only the evaluated condition would need to be checked, but thats not what gets generated currently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like yes actually. I thought C# would drop the dead code path here, but looks like its not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. I agree if the generator is changed to lower everything, then this evaluation could be more fine grained. But for now, it will generate the whole thing, so all 3 need to be constant evaluated in order to generate const.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this looks good and I'll merge once CI finishes