-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pip 8.0 #83
pip 8.0 #83
Conversation
Also cc'ing @dstufft here since he may have an opinion. |
I think it's reasonable to just move to the latest version of |
8.0.2 is going to be cut soon, so we'll just wait and I'll update this PR: pypa/pip#3415 (comment) |
Updated for 8.0.2. |
Same strange failure: https://travis-ci.org/docker-library/python/jobs/103982805#L8818-L8821. 😢 But those lines look the same to me! |
It's a difference in trailing whitespace. Lemme see what this test is doing. |
Yeah, I have literally no idea. :) I'm guessing this is just broken even if we didn't change pip here. I can't see how updating pip would affect that. |
I just ran the test on current diff --git a/3.5/Dockerfile b/3.5/Dockerfile
index aa32199..51c3340 100644
--- a/3.5/Dockerfile
+++ b/3.5/Dockerfile
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
ENV PYTHON_VERSION 3.5.1
# if this is called "PIP_VERSION", pip explodes with "ValueError: invalid truth value '<VERSION>'"
-ENV PYTHON_PIP_VERSION 7.1.2
+ENV PYTHON_PIP_VERSION 8.0.2
RUN set -ex \
&& gpg --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys "$GPG_KEY" \ And I get the same error: $ testing python:3
'python-hy' [1/1]...failed; unexpected output:
--- /home/sauron/dicker/stackbrew/test/tests/python-hy/expected-std-out.txt 2015-03-10 16:42:26.130754729 -0700
+++ - 2016-01-21 16:26:37.942146623 -0800
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-4
-42
+4
+42
$ # piped to a file
$ hexdump --canonical _u temp-file
00000000 74 65 73 74 69 6e 67 20 70 79 74 68 6f 6e 3a 33 |testing python:3|
00000010 0a 09 27 70 79 74 68 6f 6e 2d 68 79 27 20 5b 31 |..'python-hy' [1|
00000020 2f 31 5d 2e 2e 2e 66 61 69 6c 65 64 3b 20 75 6e |/1]...failed; un|
00000030 65 78 70 65 63 74 65 64 20 6f 75 74 70 75 74 3a |expected output:|
00000040 0a 2d 2d 2d 20 2f 68 6f 6d 65 2f 73 61 75 72 6f |.--- /home/sauro|
00000050 6e 2f 64 69 63 6b 65 72 2f 73 74 61 63 6b 62 72 |n/dicker/stackbr|
00000060 65 77 2f 74 65 73 74 2f 74 65 73 74 73 2f 70 79 |ew/test/tests/py|
00000070 74 68 6f 6e 2d 68 79 2f 65 78 70 65 63 74 65 64 |thon-hy/expected|
00000080 2d 73 74 64 2d 6f 75 74 2e 74 78 74 09 32 30 31 |-std-out.txt.201|
00000090 35 2d 30 33 2d 31 30 20 31 36 3a 34 32 3a 32 36 |5-03-10 16:42:26|
000000a0 2e 31 33 30 37 35 34 37 32 39 20 2d 30 37 30 30 |.130754729 -0700|
000000b0 0a 2b 2b 2b 20 2d 09 32 30 31 36 2d 30 31 2d 32 |.+++ -.2016-01-2|
000000c0 31 20 31 36 3a 32 36 3a 33 37 2e 39 34 32 31 34 |1 16:26:37.94214|
000000d0 36 36 32 33 20 2d 30 38 30 30 0a 40 40 20 2d 31 |6623 -0800.@@ -1|
000000e0 2c 32 20 2b 31 2c 32 20 40 40 0a 2d 34 0a 2d 34 |,2 +1,2 @@.-4.-4|
000000f0 32 0a 2b 1b 5b 3f 32 35 6c 1b 5b 3f 32 35 68 1b |2.+.[?25l.[?25h.|
00000100 5b 3f 32 35 6c 1b 5b 3f 32 35 68 1b 5b 3f 32 35 |[?25l.[?25h.[?25|
00000110 6c 1b 5b 3f 32 35 68 34 0a 2b 1b 5b 3f 32 35 6c |l.[?25h4.+.[?25l|
00000120 1b 5b 3f 32 35 68 34 32 0a |.[?25h42.|
00000129 upgrading pip changed the output? |
Oh, I see. This test is actually calling It looks like it's outputting color escape sequences now? |
Actually, looking at this more, I'm more confused. This isn't output from This print(2 + 2)
import pip
pip.main(['install', '-q', 'sh'])
from sh import echo
print(int(echo('-n', 21)) + int(echo('-n', 21))) So the fact that we're getting garbage before both I assume versions of I'm not sure what else to do here except point my finger at a weird test that appears to be unrelated. |
So this is even weirder. I get this from a python prompt:
This sheds a bit more light:
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#CSI_codes and look down for Why this is happening? Literally no idea, but these are clearly invisible characters that don't change the output visually. |
Turns out that |
Sounds like a bug. |
❤️ @dstufft ok, I'll file an issue 😄 |
Update: pypa/pip#3418 has been addressed, but a new version has not been pushed yet |
pip 8.0.3 has been released :) |
yay, I will update when I actually wake up. |
ff1be93
to
cf4e6d0
Compare
@yosifkit should be fixed here, and I've removed the hack that was previously needed for 3.2. |
🎉 🎉 🍰 🎉 🎉 LGTM |
Nice work everyone! 🎊 |
- `cassandra`: chown logs (docker-library/cassandra#49) - `percona`: 5.7 (docker-library/percona#16, docker-library/percona#17) - `python`: pip 8! (docker-library/python#83) - `pypy`: pip 8 - `ruby`: rubygems 2.6.0
- `cassandra`: chown logs (docker-library/cassandra#49) - `percona`: 5.7 (docker-library/percona#16, docker-library/percona#17) - `python`: pip 8! (docker-library/python#83) - `pypy`: pip 8 - `ruby`: rubygems 2.6.0
https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/news/#release-notes
pip 8.0 introduces some backwards incompatibilities, so not even entirely sure if this is a great idea.
But on the otherhand, we have no way of versioning
pip
independently frompython
in these builds.So we may end up with someone tagging to a very specific
python:2.7.11
which had pip 7.1.2, then tomorrow, gets new build with 8.0.0 and breaks their container.Thoughts?