Skip to content

chore(credit): record co-authorship dropped by three squash merges - #14362

Merged
diegosouzapw merged 1 commit into
release/v3.8.51from
chore/credit-squash-coauthors-0921b
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

diegosouzapw merged 1 commit into
release/v3.8.51from
chore/credit-squash-coauthors-0921b

Conversation

@diegosouzapw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Second attempt at #14361 — GitHub's rebase-merge silently dropped the empty commit, so nothing landed. This one carries a changelog.d/maintenance fragment (so the credit also reaches the release notes) plus the same Co-authored-by trailers.

squash re-landed / superseded credit
7a921299 (#14159) #12630 @BillyOutlast — dual-layer semantic cache
cd4c6f69 (#14162) #13180 @mdigitalbh81 (Felipe Reis) — native Codex auto-resume
53a147c7 (#13295) #13036 @ggiak — the resolvedExtensionEnd reorder landed first there

Merge with "Rebase and merge" so the commit lands verbatim with its trailers.

Three squash merges on release/v3.8.51 lost the contributor attribution that
the pipeline had preserved on the branches:

- 7a92129 (#14159) re-landed #12630: the dual-layer semantic cache is
  @BillyOutlast's work; the squash author is the maintainer.
- cd4c6f6 (#14162) re-landed #13180: the native Codex auto-resume fix is
  Felipe Reis's (@mdigitalbh81); the squash author is the maintainer.
- 53a147c (#13295) shipped the same one-line resolvedExtensionEnd reorder
  that @ggiak landed first in #13036; the squash carried no trailer.

The changelog fragment and these trailers record that credit in the branch
history, the contributors graph and the release notes.

Co-authored-by: BillyOutlast <172061051+BillyOutlast@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felipe Reis <mdigitalbh81@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giorgos Giakoumettis <giorgos@yiakoumettis.gr>
Co-authored-by: ggiak <20743694+ggiak@users.noreply.github.com>

@Intrvrt6 Intrvrt6 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants