Skip to content

feat(pricing): add GLM-5.3-Flash pricing, model specs, and catalog registration - #11830

Merged
diegosouzapw merged 3 commits into
diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51from
AndrianBalanescu:feat/glm-5.3-flash
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

diegosouzapw merged 3 commits into
diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51from
AndrianBalanescu:feat/glm-5.3-flash

Conversation

@AndrianBalanescu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds official default pricing and model specifications for glm-5.3-flash (released 2026-08-26 by Z.AI / models.dev).

Changes

  • src/shared/constants/pricing/shared-tiers.ts: Add glm-5.3-flash default pricing ($0.075 / $0.25 / $0.015 cached per 1M tokens)
  • open-sse/config/glmProvider.ts: Register glm-5.3-flash in GLM_SHARED_MODELS with 1M context, 128K max output, thinking and vision capabilities
  • open-sse/config/providers/registry/zai/index.ts: Add glm-5.3-flash to zai provider registry models
  • src/shared/constants/modelSpecs.ts: Add glm-5.3-flash to AUTHORITATIVE_CONTEXT_WINDOW_MODEL_IDS and MODEL_SPECS
  • src/shared/constants/visionModels.ts: Add glm-5.3-flash to vision model list
  • tests/unit/glm-5.3-catalog-and-effort-tiers.test.ts: Unit test assertions for catalog exposure, specs, vision, and pricing

Validation

  • tests/unit/glm-5.3-catalog-and-effort-tiers.test.ts (19/19 passing)
  • npm run typecheck:core (clean)

diegosouzapw and others added 2 commits August 29, 2026 01:54
Co-authored-by: diegosouzapw <8016841+diegosouzapw@users.noreply.github.com>
@diegosouzapw
diegosouzapw merged commit e0029eb into diegosouzapw:release/v3.8.51 Aug 30, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
diegosouzapw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2026
Adiciona suporte ao GLM-5.3-Flash Coding Plan (endpoint OpenAI-compatible, tiers de esforço low/high/max via reasoning_effort). Boa cobertura de testes. Validado no worktree combinado.

Dois problemas resolvidos antes de mergear:
1. **Duplicata silenciosa de "glm-5.3-flash"** em `src/shared/constants/modelSpecs.ts` e `open-sse/config/glmProvider.ts` (#11830, já mergeado nesta sessão, e sua PR inserem a mesma entrada em pontos diferentes do arquivo — git não detecta como conflito textual). Removida a duplicata, preservando a ordem que o teste pré-existente `open-sse/mcp-server/__tests__/glmCodingProviderConfig.test.ts` espera (glm-5.3-flash primeiro no array `GLM_SHARED_MODELS`).
2. Conflito real em `zai/index.ts`, `default.ts`, `pricing/shared-tiers.ts` e no teste de catálogo — todos aditivos, resolvidos mantendo ambos os lados.

27/27 + 10/10 (vitest) testes focados verdes. Obrigado!
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
…gistration (diegosouzapw#11830)

Adiciona GLM-5.3-Flash ao catálogo com pricing/specs e teste próprio. Validado no worktree combinado (typecheck limpo, teste focado verde). Obrigado!
muhamadgalihsaputra pushed a commit to niyatna/NiyatnaRoute that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
Adiciona suporte ao GLM-5.3-Flash Coding Plan (endpoint OpenAI-compatible, tiers de esforço low/high/max via reasoning_effort). Boa cobertura de testes. Validado no worktree combinado.

Dois problemas resolvidos antes de mergear:
1. **Duplicata silenciosa de "glm-5.3-flash"** em `src/shared/constants/modelSpecs.ts` e `open-sse/config/glmProvider.ts` (diegosouzapw#11830, já mergeado nesta sessão, e sua PR inserem a mesma entrada em pontos diferentes do arquivo — git não detecta como conflito textual). Removida a duplicata, preservando a ordem que o teste pré-existente `open-sse/mcp-server/__tests__/glmCodingProviderConfig.test.ts` espera (glm-5.3-flash primeiro no array `GLM_SHARED_MODELS`).
2. Conflito real em `zai/index.ts`, `default.ts`, `pricing/shared-tiers.ts` e no teste de catálogo — todos aditivos, resolvidos mantendo ambos os lados.

27/27 + 10/10 (vitest) testes focados verdes. Obrigado!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants