Relax bounds #2602
Merged
Relax bounds #2602
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM; Thank you @TeofilC ! |
|
Could we please get a corresponding Hackage revision? |
|
Oops! Sorry about that I believe these should all be published as matching revisions to Hackage now |
|
Thanks! |
|
you're welcome! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This relaxes most bounds as indicated by cabal outdated.
I've checked and all the tests pass. This allows building the library with GHC 9.10.
The only thing I've left behind is lsp as it seems like there's some breaking changes there and there's an existing PR for that.
In order to build with GHC-9.10, you will also need the following allow-newers added to cabal.project: