Clap v3 configuration abstraction for bootstrap command.#564
Clap v3 configuration abstraction for bootstrap command.#564
Conversation
|
@enzoh note that the eval failure So you have 3 options:
|
|
@enzoh Are you still working on this? |
|
Hey, I could not get the hybrid approach to pass e2e tests, and spent significant time trying to make it work. My time is split, with the majority going to TikTok. Will try to revisit this over the weekend, and see where I get, but it's looking like we may need to upgrade all commands before merging to master is feasible. |
|
To clarify next steps then. I would create another PR for build command that branches from this branch. Then the same for cache command, and etc. Finally, we would need to review all of them together and verify that e2e passes as expected. |
|
Closing this PR as it hasn't been updated in the last 60 days. Please reopen if this work is still relevant. |
## Changelog for advisory-db: Branch: master Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@8e1ad08e...b08a98ac](rustsec/advisory-db@8e1ad08...b08a98a) * [`14b29c77`](rustsec/advisory-db@14b29c7) Typo in RUSTSEC-2020-0013 ([RustSec/advisory-db#562](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/562)) * [`b08a98ac`](rustsec/advisory-db@b08a98a) Fix typo in http CVE number ([RustSec/advisory-db#564](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/564))
## Changelog for advisory-db: Branch: master Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@8e1ad08e...b08a98ac](rustsec/advisory-db@8e1ad08...b08a98a) * [`14b29c77`](rustsec/advisory-db@14b29c7) Typo in RUSTSEC-2020-0013 ([RustSec/advisory-db#562](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/562)) * [`b08a98ac`](rustsec/advisory-db@b08a98a) Fix typo in http CVE number ([RustSec/advisory-db#564](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/564))
No description provided.