Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More accurate 3rd-party library filtration #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

dfed
Copy link
Owner

@dfed dfed commented Oct 4, 2024

Some 3rd party modules have custom paths, which results in us parsing way more files than needed.

There isn't a foolproof way to find out if a module is 3rd party, but this comes reasonably close.

@dfed dfed self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (10726cb) to head (cc19f89).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #117   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.59%   99.59%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        2728     2728           
=======================================
  Hits         2717     2717           
  Misses         11       11           

@dfed dfed force-pushed the dfed--better-location-finding branch from a5ac211 to cc19f89 Compare October 4, 2024 05:12
@dfed dfed marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 05:18
@dfed dfed merged commit baa1f9e into main Oct 4, 2024
12 checks passed
@dfed dfed deleted the dfed--better-location-finding branch October 4, 2024 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant